Garden Design and Architects' Gardens: Two reviews, illustrated, to show, by actual examples from British gardens, that clipping and aligning trees to make them 'harmonise' with architecture is barbarous, needless, and inartistic — John Shaqi
Garden Design and Architects' Gardens: Two reviews, illustrated, to show, by actual examples from British gardens, that clipping and aligning trees to make them 'harmonise' with architecture is barbarous, needless, and inartisticRobinson, W. (William)
General
Garden Design and Architects' Gardens: Two reviews, illustrated, to show, by actual examples from British gardens, that clipping and aligning trees to make them 'harmonise' with architecture is barbarous, needless, and inartistic
Robinson, W. (William)
Blomfield, Reginald Theodore, Sir, 1856-1942. Formal garden in England; Landscape gardening; Sedding, John D. (John Dando), 1838-1891. Garden-craft old and new
No sane person has ever proposed to ignore the house. So far from
ignoring the house in my own work, where there is a beautiful house it
tells me what to do! Unhappily, the house is often so bad that nothing
can prevent its evil effect on the garden. "_Reproducing uncultivated
Nature_" is no part of good gardening, as the whole reason of a flower
garden is that it is a home for cultivated Nature. It is the special
charm of the garden that we may have beautiful natural objects in their
living beauty in it, but we cannot do this without care and culture to
begin with! Whether it be Atlas Cedar or Eastern Cypress, Lily-tree or
American Mountain Laurel, all must be cared for at first, and we must
know their ways of life and growth if we are to treat them so that they
will both grow well and be rightly placed--an essential point. And the
more precious and rare they are the better the place they should have in
the flower garden proper or pleasure ground,--places always the object
of a certain essential amount of care even under the simplest and wisest
plans. If we wish to encourage "uncultivated Nature" it must surely be a
little further afield! A wretched flowerless pinched bedding plant and a
great yellow climbing Tea Rose are both cultivated things, but what a
vast difference in their beauty! There are many kinds of "cultivated
Nature," and every degree of ugliness among them.
Sir C. Barry's idea was that the garden was gradually to become less
and less formal till it melted away into the park. Compromises such as
these, however, will be rejected by thoroughgoing adherents of the
formal gardens who hold that the garden should be avowedly separated
from the adjacent country by a clean boundary line, a good high wall
for choice. (_The Formal Garden._)
Would any one put this high wall in front of Gilbert White's house at
Selborne, or of Golder's Hill at Hampstead, or many English houses where
the erection of a high wall would cut off the landscape? Not a word
about the vast variety of such situations, each of which would require
to be treated in a way quite different from the rest! There are many
places in every county that would be robbed of their best charms by
separating the garden from the adjacent country by a "good high wall."
[Illustration: _Gilbert White's house at Selborne. Example of many
gardens with lawn coming to windows and flowers on its margin_]
The custom of planting avenues and cutting straight lines through the
woods surrounding the house to radiate in all directions was a
departure from that strictly logical system which separated the garden
from the park, and left the latter to take care of itself, a system
which frankly subordinated Nature to art within the garden wall, but
in return gave Nature an absolutely free hand outside it. (_The Formal
Garden._)
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account