Gem-Stones and Their Distinctive CharactersSmith, George Frederick Herbert
Science
Gem-Stones and Their Distinctive Characters
Smith, George Frederick Herbert
Precious stones
The number of diamonds which exceed a hundred carats in weight when
cut is very limited. Their extreme costliness renders them something
more than mere ornaments; in a condensed and portable form they
represent great wealth and all the potentiality for good or ill thereby
entailed, and have played no small, if sinister, rôle in the moulding
of history. In bygone days when despotic government was universal, the
possession of a splendid jewel in weak hands but too often precipitated
the aggression of a greedy and powerful neighbour, and plunged whole
countries into the horrors of a ruthless and bloody war. In more
civilized days a great diamond has often been pledged as security for
money to replenish an empty treasury in times of stress. The ambitions
of Napoleon might have received a set-back but for the funds raised
on the security of the famous Pitt diamond. The history of such
stones—often one long romance—is full of interest, but space will not
permit of more than a brief sketch here.
If we except the colossal Cullinan stone, the mines of Brazil and South
Africa cannot compare with the old mines of India as the birthplace of
large and perfect diamonds of world-wide fame.
(1) KOH-I-NOR
[Illustration: FIG. 61.—Koh-i-nor (top view).]
[Illustration: FIG. 62.—Koh-i-nor (side view).]
The history of the famous stone called the Koh-i-nor, meaning Mound of
Light, is known as far back as the year 1304, when it fell into the
hands of the Mogul emperors, and legend even traces it back some four
thousand years previously. It remained at Delhi until the invasion of
North-West India by Nadir Shah in 1739, when it passed together with an
immense amount of spoil into the hands of the conqueror. At his death
the empire which he had so strenuously founded fell to pieces, and
the great diamond after many vicissitudes came into the possession of
Runjit Singh at Lahore. His successors kept it until upon the fall of
the Sikh power in 1850 it passed to the East India Company, in whose
name it was presented by Lord Dalhousie to Queen Victoria. At this
date the stone still retained its original Indian form, but in 1862 it
was re-cut into the form of a shallow brilliant (Fig. 62), the weight
thereby being reduced from 186-1/16 to 106-1/16 carats. The wisdom
of this course has been severely criticized; the stone has not the
correct shape of a brilliant and is deficient in ‘fire,’ and it has
with the change in shape lost much of its old historical interest.
The Koh-i-nor is the private property of the English Royal Family, the
stone shown in the Tower being a model. It is valued at £100,000.
(2) PITT OR REGENT
[Illustration: FIG. 63.—Pitt or Regent (top view).]
[Illustration: FIG. 64.—Pitt or Regent (side view).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account