The supraspecific categories of the chipmunks, as in most other groups
of squirrels, have been a source of controversy for many years. Before
presenting new evidence and a review of older evidence bearing on the
problem, it seems desirable to review briefly in chronological order,
the taxonomic history of the genera and subgenera of the chipmunks.
HISTORICAL
Linnaeus (1758:64) described the eastern North American chipmunks under
the name _Sciurus striatus_ and based his description on that of Catesby
(1743:75). The Asiatic chipmunk was first described, under the name
_Sciurus sibiricus_, by Laxmann (1769:69). Schreber (1785, 4:790)
separated the Asiatic and North American chipmunks into the Asiatic and
American varieties. Gmelin (1788:50) followed Schreber and, employing
trinomials, used the names _Sciurus striatus asiaticus_ and _S. s.
americanus_. Illiger (1811:83) proposed _Tamias_ as the generic name of
the chipmunk of eastern North America. Say (1823:45) described _Sciurus
quadrivittatus_, the first species of chipmunk known from western North
America.
Trouessart (1880:86-87) proposed _Eutamias_ as the subgeneric name to
include the western North American and Asiatic chipmunks.
Merriam (1897:189-190) raised _Eutamias_ to full generic rank. In so
doing he neither listed nor described any characters but wrote that "it
will be observed that the name _Eutamias_, proposed by Trouessart in
1880 as a subgenus of _Tamias_ is here adopted as a full genus. This is
because of the conviction that the superficial resemblance between the
two groups is accidental parallelism, in no way indicative of affinity.
In fact the two groups, if my notion of their relationship is correct,
had different ancestors, _Tamias_ being an offshoot of the
ground-squirrels of the subgenus _Ictidomys_ of Allen, and _Eutamias_
of the subgenus _Ammospermophilus_, Merriam."
Howell (1929:23) proposed _Neotamias_ as the subgeneric name for the
chipmunks of western North America, of the genus _Eutamias_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account