Let us confine ourselves to this general view, which is from accurate observation; let us abandon reasoning, where experiments are not the basis of it. Some modern authors have been less judicious; they have admitted a nervous atmosphere extending more or less remotely, and acting at a determinate distance; so that though an organ may not receive a nerve, it is sufficient that it should be in the atmosphere of a nervous cord to be the seat of sensations. This ingenious idea of Reil, should be placed at the side of a great number of those that Bordeu has scattered in his works, and which are rather proofs of an ingenious author, than an accurate and judicious mind, hostile to every opinion not founded on rigorous experiment. In fact, what is this atmosphere? Is it an emanation that is constantly made at the exterior of the nerves? Is it a fluid that is independent of them, and that nature has placed around each nervous cord, as it has placed the air around the earth? Is it a power that has been given to the nerves to act at a distance without intermediate bodies? Some galvanic experiments seem to prove something similar to this in the nerves; but these experiments have no relation to the transmission of animal sensibility. Moreover, when pain takes place in the middle of a very thick tendon, in the centre of a large articulation, as that of the knee for example, it would be necessary that the atmosphere of nervous activity should extend sometimes even an inch. Why is there not suffering produced, by the irritation of an insensible part that is at the side of a nerve, or even connected with it, whilst the pain is very acute in an inflamed part, though it is at a distance from every nervous cord? Would the nerves then have also, a sphere of activity for motion? But why should the contiguity of the nerve never be sufficient to produce it in the muscles? Why is it not the same of sensation? _Animal contractility. Influence of the nerves upon that of the other parts._ The texture of the nerves is wholly destitute of this contractility. No kind of sensible motion is ever observed in them; they perform however an essential part in this property, considered in relation to the muscles of animal life. We shall see that they are the essential agents which transmit to them the principle of motion; so that animal contractility always supposes the exercise of three successive actions, viz. that of the brain, the nerves and the muscles.