It is easy to understand, from these views upon the articular motions, the division into genera of the class of moveable articulations. In fact, there are articulations in which all the motions are united; in others, there is no rotation; in many rotation and circumduction are wanting, and opposition exists only in one direction; some have only rotation. Finally, there are those in which rotation, circumduction and opposition are nothing, and sliding alone remains. Hence we see that nature moves here as elsewhere by gradation, that from the most moveable articulations to those that are the least so, there are different degrees of decrease, that she descends gradually to the immoveable articulations, that she is finally reduced to the motion of sliding alone, like that which exists at the carpus, the tarsus, &c. There is even an intermediate one between sliding and immobility; it is the articulation of the symphysis pubis; which can be considered with that of the humerus as forming the two extremes of the series of moveable articulations. All the articulations of which I have spoken are with contiguous surfaces; this is the general character of those which are moveable. There is however an exception to this rule; it is the articulation of the body of the vertebræ, in which there is continuity and mobility. The symphysis pubis is also in part continuous in its surfaces, and yet has sometimes obscure motions. Hence arises a division of the moveable articulations, into those with continuous surfaces, and into those with contiguous ones. _Immoveable Articulations._ The immoveable articulations are sometimes with surfaces inserted into each other, as the bones of the cranium, in which many projections and depressions reciprocally receive each other; sometimes with surfaces in juxta-position, as in the articulation of the temporal with the parietal, the two superior maxillary bones with each other; sometimes with implanted surfaces, as in the teeth. All the different divisions that I have mentioned will be easily understood by the following table; it is not the same as that which I have given in my treatise on the membranes; I think it presents a classification a little more useful in this, that it offers for a characteristic two things essential to be known in all kinds of moveable articulations, viz. 1st, the relation of the articular surfaces which characterizes the orders; 2d, the number of motions of each which distinguishes the genera. There are no orders in the immoveable articulations because, except the relation of surfaces, the articulations have not differences sufficient to occasion them to be sub-divided. _Table of the Articulations._