Every thing is irritating to the naked muscle, the air, water, neutral salts, the acids, the alkalis, the earths, metals, animal and vegetable substances, &c. The mere contact is sufficient to produce contraction. Yet besides this contact, there is something also which depends upon the nature of the stimuli, and which makes the intensity of the contractions vary. A powder of wood, coal, metal, &c. sprinkled upon the muscles of a frog, produce but slight motions in it; pour on it a neutral salt in powder, the marine salt for example, immediately irregular agitations, and a thousand different oscillations are manifested. Each body is by its nature capable of irritating the muscles differently, as according to individuals, ages, temperaments, seasons, climates, &c. the muscles are capable of answering differently to excitements made upon them. It is not necessary to irritate the whole of a muscle to produce its contraction; two or three fibres only being pricked bring into action all the others. Often even when we make these experiments on a living animal, the contraction is communicated from one muscle to another. In general I have constantly observed that during life these experiments are less easy, and give results much more various, as we have already stated with regard to animal contractility. Lay bare a muscle, irritate it at many different times; sometimes it does not give the least sign of contractility; sometimes it moves with force; this varies from one instant to another. Whereas if it is upon an animal recently killed that the experiments are made, the results are always nearly the same in a given time, with the difference however of the weakness which the contractions have in proportion to the length of time after death. It never happens that you see a muscle immoveable under stimuli, which is not rare in a living animal. This essential difference which authors have not sufficiently pointed out, and which I have frequently proved upon different animals, arises from this, that during life, the effects of the nervous influence counteract those of the stimuli; for example, if an animal extends with force his thigh by the posterior muscles, we may in vain irritate the anterior ones, we cannot produce flexion by this irritation. The cerebral excitement in the extensors being stronger than the mechanical excitement in the flexors, triumphs. Often when we apply the stimulant, the brain acts with force upon the muscle, the effect is then much superior to the excitement we have applied. We are astonished; but the astonishment ceases, if we recollect that there is a concurrence of two excitements, of that of the external agent and of that of the brain. In general, those who have made experiments, have not paid sufficient attention to this concurrence of the two forces in a living animal.