If we examine but little the number of the absorbents distributed in all the parts, it will be easily understood, how enormous the disproportion of their capacity is with that of these two trunks. How is it that all the serum contained upon the serous surfaces and in the cellular texture, that all the residuum of nutrition, that all the fat, the medullary fluid, and synovia, that all the drinks, all the product of the solid aliments that constantly enter the circulation, can pass, in order to get there, through vessels so small? This observation has struck all authors; and it is, I confess, very difficult to explain. In fact, 1st. When there is a disproportion in the capacity of the blood vessels, it is compensated for by an increase of velocity where the caliber is less; thus, though the capacity of the veins exceeds that of the pulmonary artery, still all the blood of the first passes through the second. Now if we examine in a dog the thoracic duct during digestion, which can easily be done by opening quickly the thorax on the right side, raising the lungs of that side, and by cutting the pleura along the aorta, which allows you to see immediately this canal then very white on account of the chyle that is passing through it, if, I say, we examine the thoracic duct in action, we shall see that the circulation goes on there nearly as in the veins. By opening it then, a more powerful throw of fluid does not indicate a greater velocity than that of the venous blood. 2d. It might perhaps be said that during life the thoracic duct is sufficiently dilated to correspond to all the absorbents; but observation proves precisely the contrary. The thoracic duct, full of chyle, is undoubtedly a little more dilated than in the dead body; but I have satisfied myself repeatedly that the difference is not very great. 3d. By supposing that a great quantity of fluids passes through the thoracic duct, notwithstanding its size, the vena cava superior ought to be proportionably dilated between it and the heart; yet it continues nearly of the same size after having received this canal. 4th. Hewson, by taking the fluid of the lymphatics, has proved that it was analogous to that of the serous surfaces; its transparency, when examined in the vessels of a living animal, makes me also believe it, though this would not be a conclusive reason. How can a fluid of the same kind, result from the combination of such different elements, viz. of those which compose the mucous, cutaneous, nutritive, fatty absorptions, &c. I confess that the different substances that enter the black blood by the thoracic duct and the one corresponding to it, may enter it at different times; that the lymph, the fat, the chyle can each have their time of passing. But first this explanation is not supported by any fact, and the disproportion would also then be very great.