Many distinguished anatomists have thought that the veins absorb, and in relation, to their use, they have joined these vessels to the lymphatics. Haller, Meckel, and before them, Kaw Boerhaave, were of this opinion. Such names deserve undoubtedly an examination of the reasons advanced; let us now consider these reasons. 1st. The thoracic duct has been seen obliterated, and absorption continuing to go on, while life was preserved in the animal. But as they have not observed whether the great right lymphatic and its accessories were obliterated, nothing can be concluded from this fact. Besides the observations upon this point do not appear to me to be well ascertained. They could decide this question very easily, I think, by tying during digestion, the thoracic duct at its entrance into the jugular; it could be readily come at on the inferior part of the neck, where it could be distinguished by its whiteness; no important part need be wounded. This experiment would throw great light upon the general question of absorptions. 2d. Fine injections, made through the mesenteric vein, cover the peritoneum; hence it has been concluded that the absorbents terminate in this vein. But as the venous extremities communicate with the capillary system, and as this gives rise to the exhalants, injections, by going through its numerous anastomoses, can easily be spread in this way, which vitality shuts during life, but which the flaccidity of the parts and the absence of sensibility open after death. 3d. Compression of the superficial veins produces swelling of the limbs; but as this compression is made at the same time upon the absorbents, no inference respecting venous absorption can be drawn from it. 4th. Kaw Boerhaave having introduced water into the intestinal canal, it was afterwards found in the mesenteric veins; but this experiment has been many times repeated since without giving the same result. 5th. Add to these considerations the numerous experiments of Dr. Hunter, to prove that venous absorption does not take place on the surface of the intestines, and you will see that this absorption will appear very uncertain, in these first respects. But if you look at the question in other respects, you will be unable to deny that certain facts present probabilities in favour of this absorption. 1st. It is almost certain, that the venous extremities take up by the way of absorption, the blood effused in the corpus cavernosum. 2d. We do not see absorbents in the placenta, and yet the umbilical vein takes up all the fluids of this body. 3d. Meckel having injected a lymphatic vessel that went to a gland, the injected mercury passed into a neighbouring vein.