Brock, Isaac, Sir, 1769-1812; Canada -- History -- 1763-1867; United States -- History -- War of 1812
General Brock's hopeful anticipation of help from {184} England was
not realized during 1812. The preparations for defence were woefully
hampered by the instructions which Sir George Prevost undoubtedly
received from the home government to avoid expenditure. He was
limited as to expenses, and repeatedly cautioned not to provoke
hostilities. Consent had been given to the completion of the
defences of Quebec, but while millions were given to help Spain, and
Austria, and Russia, and Prussia against Napoleon, Canada was left
without money or soldiers. There was neither money to meet the cost
of a war, nor troops to carry it through with any chance of success.
Nor was it in a quarrel of her own that Canada was engaged, but the
quarrel was forced upon her because she was the most vulnerable part
of the British empire.
The measures that General Brock hoped to carry through the House
were: (1) A militia supplementary act; (2) the suspension of the
habeas corpus; (3) an alien law, and the offer of a reward for the
apprehension of deserters. He knew well that there were traitors
even in the House of Assembly and among the militia, men who had
recently come from the United States and whose sympathies were with
the latter country. He was convinced that it was advisable to
require every one to take an oath of allegiance abjuring all foreign
powers. He wrote: "If I succeed in all this I shall claim some
praise, but I am not without my fears."
The administrator was doomed to be disappointed {185} in securing the
support of the two Houses of the legislature to the measures he had
thought necessary to recommend. The bill to introduce the oath of
abjuration was lost by the casting vote of the chairman. The bill
for the suspension of the habeas corpus was lost by a small majority,
partly because the members did not see its necessity, not believing
that war would take place. General Brock thought that the reason for
the acts not passing was the great influence the numerous settlers
from the United States possessed over the decision of the Lower
House. He thought this influence was alarming, and could be remedied
only by encouraging "real subjects" to settle in the province. He
recommended that grants of Crown lands should be given to any Scotch
emigrants who should enlist in the Glengarry Fencibles. He wrote to
Colonel Baynes at Quebec concerning the disappointment he felt at the
failure of the assembly to pass the bills he wanted. In reply,
Baynes said: "Sir George, who is well versed in the fickle and
intractable disposition of public assemblies, feels more regret than
disappointment. He has a very delicate card to play himself with his
House of Assembly here, who would fain keep up the farce of being
highly charmed with his amiable disposition and affable manners."
[Sidenote: The President's message]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account