Brock, Isaac, Sir, 1769-1812; Canada -- History -- 1763-1867; United States -- History -- War of 1812
On the 31st Sir George wrote again: "I had scarcely closed the letter
addressed to you yesterday when an aide-de-camp from Major-General
Dearborn {270} made his appearance and delivered to me the despatch
herewith transmitted." The despatch announced that the president of
the United States had not thought proper to authorize a continuance
of the provisional measure entered into by His Excellency and General
Dearborn, through the Adjutant-General Colonel Baynes; consequently,
the armistice was to cease four days from the time of the
communication reaching Montreal and the posts of Kingston and Fort
George. This despatch had been written while the authorities at
Washington were in ignorance of what had happened at Detroit, for it
said: "If a suspension of offensive operations shall have been
mutually consented to between General Hull and the commanding officer
of the British forces at and near Detroit, as proposed, they will
respectively be authorized at the expiration of four days, subsequent
to their receiving copies of this communication, to consider
themselves released from any agreement thus entered into."
General Brock adds a postscript on September 4th to the letter to his
brother: "Hostilities, I this instant understand, are to be renewed
in four days, and though landed only two hours I must return
immediately to Niagara, whence I shall write fully." General Brock
was of the opinion that an expedition should be immediately sent to
Sacketts Harbour, thirty-five miles across the lake from Kingston, in
order to destroy the arsenal there, {271} but Sir George Prevost
disapproved. The official intelligence of the president's refusal to
continue the truce reached the commander-in-chief at Montreal on
August 30th, a day or two before the arrival there of Captain Glegg
with the trophies and the despatches relating to the capture of
Detroit. The attack on Sacketts Harbour could have been carried into
effect immediately on the cessation of the armistice, but the
opportunity was allowed to pass. In fact, in his general order of
August 31st, Sir George Prevost was rather apologetic for having
dared to invade the territory of the United States.
[Sidenote: The British government]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account