General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great BritainPeters, Samuel
History
General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great Britain
Peters, Samuel
Connecticut -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Connecticut -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
It was the general opinion that the pastor’s work consisted
principally in exhortation, in working upon the will and
affections of the people. To this the whole force of his
study was to be directed, that by his judicious, powerful,
and affectionate addresses he might win his hearers to the
love and practice of the truth. But the teacher was _Doctor
in Ecclesia_, whose business was to teach, and explain, and
defend the doctrines of Christianity. He was to inform the
judgment, and advance the work of illumination.
The business of the ruling elder was to assist the pastor in
the government of the church. He was particularly set apart
to watch over all its members; to prepare and bring forward
all cases of discipline; to visit and pray with the sick;
and, in absence of the pastor and teacher, to pray with the
congregation and expound the Scriptures.
The pastors and churches of New England maintained with the
reformed churches in general that bishops and presbyters
were only different names for the same office; and that all
pastors regularly elected to the gospel ministry were
Scripture bishops. They also insisted, agreeably to the
primitive practice, that the work of every pastor was
confined principally to one particular church and
congregation, who could all assemble in one place, whom he
could inspect, and who could all unite together in acts of
worship and discipline. Indeed, the first ministers of
Connecticut and New England at first maintained that all the
pastor’s office power was confined to his own church and
congregation, and that the administering of baptism and the
Lord’s Supper in other churches was irregular.
With respect to ordination, they held that it did not
constitute the essentials of ministerial office; but the
qualifications for office were the election of the church,
guided by the rule of Christ, and the acceptance of the
pastor-elect. Says Mr. Hooker, “Ordination is an approbation
of the officer, and solemn setting and confirmation of him
in his office by prayer and laying on of hands.”
It was viewed by the ministers of New England as no more
than putting the pastor-elect in office, or a solemn
recommending of him and his labors to the blessing of God.
It was the general opinion that elders ought to lay on hands
in ordination if there were a presbytery in the church, but,
if there were not, the church might appoint some other
elders, or a number of the brethren, to perform that
service.--ED. NOTE.
[15] On the 4th of June, 1689, all the free planters at
Quinnipiack convened in a large barn of Mr. Newman’s, and,
in a very formal and solemn manner, proceeded to lay the
foundations of their civil and religious polity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account