General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great BritainPeters, Samuel
History
General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great Britain
Peters, Samuel
Connecticut -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Connecticut -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
New Haven and Branford were more fixed and obstinate in
their opposition to an incorporation with Connecticut than
any of the other towns in that colony. Mr. Davenport and Mr.
Pierson seem to have been among its chief supporters. They,
with many of the inhabitants of the colony, were more rigid
with respect to the terms of church-communion than the
ministers and churches of Connecticut generally were. A
considerable number of the churches in Connecticut were in
favor of the propositions of the General Council, which met
at Cambridge in 1662, relative to baptism of children whose
parents were not in full communion. The ministers and
churches of New Haven were universally and utterly against
them. Mr. Davenport, and others in this colony, were also
strong in the opinion that all government should be in the
Church. No person in the colony could be a freeman unless he
was a member in full communion. But, in Connecticut, all
orderly persons possessing a freehold to a certain amount
might be made free of the corporation. Those gentlemen who
were so strong in their opposition were jealous that a union
would mar the purity, order, and beauty of their churches,
and have an influence on the civil administrations. Besides,
it was a painful reflection that, after they had been at so
much pains and expense to form and support themselves as a
distinct government, and had been many years owned as one,
their existence must cease and their name be obliterated.
Milford at this time broke off from them, and would no more
either send magistrates or deputies to the General Court.
Mr. Richard Law, a principal gentleman in Stamford, also
deserted them.
In this state of affairs the General Assembly of Connecticut
convened on the 13th of October. This was an important
crisis with the colony. Their liberties were not only in
equal danger with those of the sister-colonies, from the
extraordinary powers and arbitrary dispositions and measures
of the king’s commissioners, but the Duke of York, a
powerful antagonist, had received a patent covering Long
Island and all that part of the colony west of Connecticut
River. William and Anne, the Duke and Duchess of Hamilton,
had petitioned his Majesty to restore to them the tract of
country granted to their father, James, Marquis of Hamilton,
in the year 1635; and his Majesty had, on the 6th of May,
1664, referred the case to the determination of Colonel
Nichols and the other commissioners. Besides, the state of
affairs with New Haven was neither comfortable nor safe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account