General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great BritainPeters, Samuel
History
General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great Britain
Peters, Samuel
Connecticut -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Connecticut -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
The opposition, however, was so general among
the people that nothing further was effected. The Court of
Commissioners was so near at hand that no further demands
were made on New Haven until their advice could be known.
The General Assembly met early in September, and passed a
remonstrance against the sitting of Governor Leet and
Deputy-Governor Jones with the commissioners. In the
remonstrance they declared that New Haven was not a colony,
but a part of Connecticut, and made claim to it as such.
They insisted that owning that as a colony, distinct from
Connecticut, after his Majesty had by his letters-patent
incorporated it with that colony, was inconsistent with the
king’s pleasure; would endanger the right of all the
colonies, and especially the charter-rights of Connecticut.
The Assembly, at the same time, declared that they would
have a tender regard to their honored friends and brethren
at New Haven, and exert themselves to accommodate them with
all the immunities and privileges which they conveyed by
their Charter.
On the 1st of September the Court of Commissioners met at
Hartford. The commissioners from New Haven were allowed
their seats with the other confederates. The case of New
Haven and Connecticut was fully heard, and though the Court
did not approve of the manner in which Connecticut had
proceeded, yet they earnestly pressed a speedy and amicable
union of the two colonies.
To remove all obstructions on their part, the commissioners
recommended it to the General Courts of Massachusetts and
Plymouth, that, in case the colony of New Haven should
incorporate with Connecticut, they might then be owned as
one colony, and send two commissioners to each meeting; and
that the determinations of any four of the six should be
equally binding on the confederates as the conclusions of
six out of eight had been before. It was also proposed that
the meeting, which had been at New Haven, should be at
Hartford.
In compliance with the advice of the commissioners, Governor
Leet convened a General Court in New Haven on the 14th of
September, and communicated the advice which had been given
them to unite. They considered whether, if the king’s
commissioners should visit them, they would not be much
better able to vindicate their liberty and just rights, in
union with Connecticut under the royal patent, than in their
present circumstances; and many insisted, notwithstanding,
“that we stand; as God had kept them to that time, was their
best way.” Others were intensely of the contrary opinion,
and, after a full discussion of the subject, no vote for
union or treaty could be obtained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account