Genius rewarded : $b The story of the sewing machineScott, John
History
Genius rewarded : $b The story of the sewing machine
Scott, John
Sewing machines -- History; Singer, Isaac Merritt, 1811-1875
Still the undaunted mechanic struggled on in poverty, bearing up under
reverses and disappointments, resolved to _force_ an unwilling public to
recognize the fact that a successful sewing machine could and actually
had been made. Slowly he gained ground; gradually he obtained access to
the public ear; by degrees he induced people to at least give his
machines a test. A few hundred dollars borrowed from friends expedited
the work of introduction, and just as the skies seemed to brighten, a
new and formidable trouble appeared. The news that Singer had made a
machine which would actually do continuous stitching brought Elias Howe,
Jr., to his door with the patent he had obtained upon another man’s
invention (as before stated), who claimed that Singer infringed his
patent, and must pay him the modest sum of $25,000 or quit the business.
It did not take long for a man who had recently borrowed forty dollars
to begin business, to decline paying twenty-five thousand dollars
tribute-money, and the consequence was that Singer found himself
burdened with litigation that threatened to swamp him.
[Illustration:
YARD OF THE GREAT SINGER FACTORY.
]
At this juncture he called in the aid of Mr. Edward Clark, whose
recognized legal and financial skill were taxed to the utmost to prevent
the utter ruin of the inventor. Mr. Clark became an equal partner, and
business was thenceforward conducted under the firm name of “I. M.
Singer & Co.”
Other inventors were stimulated by Singer’s success to vigorous efforts
at making machines of practical utility, and the consequence was a
series of infringements upon existing patents, resulting in a perfect
epidemic of litigation. Principal among the litigants was Elias Howe,
Jr., whose patent enabled him to bring all the rest under contribution,
and this he did, sueing right and left for several years. The patent of
1846 had made Howe complete master of the situation, and enabled him to
dictate the formation of a combination, by the terms of which licenses
were issued to manufacturers upon the payment of a heavy royalty for
each machine manufactured. From this royalty Howe received the monstrous
stipend of over two millions of dollars, not because he had invented
anything useful to the world, but simply because he had obtained a
patent upon the inventions of another man!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account