Sincerely,
Dr. Isaac Barrow
P.S.: It occurs to me that you may have meant your whole scheme as
some sort of straight-faced pseudo-scientific joke, similar to that of
another gentleman who bears our common Christian name.[2] If so, I fail
to comprehend it, but if you would be so kind as to explain it to me, I
will be only too happy to apologise for anything I have said.
Is. Barrow
[Footnote 2: I have no idea who this might be. The reference is as
obscure as the joke.--S.H.]
* * * * *
8 February 1667
London
Dear Mr. Newton:
I have tried to be patient with you, but your last letter was
sulphurous beyond all reason. I may not, as you intimate, be qualified
to judge the mathematical worth of your theories, but I can and do feel
qualified to judge their practical worth.
For instance, you claim that the reason your computations did not tally
with the data obtained from actual tests was that the cannon ball was
flying through the air instead of a vacuum. By whose authority do you
claim it would act thus-and-so in a vacuum? Do you have any data to
substantiate your claim? Have you ever fired a cannon in a vacuum? For
that matter have you ever fired a cannon?
What would you have our cannoneers do--use a giant-sized Von Guericke
Air Pump to evacuate the space between the cannon and the target? I
fear this would be, to say the very least, somewhat impractical and
even dangerous under battle conditions. I presume a tube of some
kind would have to be built between the enemy target and the gun
emplacement, and I dare say that by that time the enemy would become
suspicious and move the target.
You speak of "ideal conditions." My dear Newton, kindly keep it in mind
that battles are never fought under ideal conditions; if they were, we
should always win them.
If you wish to spend your time playing with airy-fairy mathematical
abstrusities which have no basis in fact, that is perfectly all right
with me. This is a free country, and no one proposes to dictate one's
private life. However, I would appreciate it if you would do me the
honor of not burdening my already overtaxed mind with such patent
nonsense.
Otherwise, your work with the tabulations has been most excellent; I am
enclosing a cheque for £20 to cover your work so far.
Sincerely,
Edward Ballister-ffoulkes, Bart.
* * * * *
12 February 1667
Cambridge
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account