Geoffrey de Mandeville: A study of the Anarchy — John Shaqi
Geoffrey de Mandeville: A study of the AnarchyRound, John Horace
History
Geoffrey de Mandeville: A study of the Anarchy
Round, John Horace
Great Britain -- History -- Stephen, 1135-1154; Mandeville, Geoffrey de, earl of Essex, -1144
"Stephen's earlier deeds of 1136 exhibit Geoffrey de Magnaville as a
baron only. There are three such, two of which certainly, and the third
probably, passed at Westminster. He was custos of the Tower of London,
an office which probably necessitated a constant residence. There are
three patents of creation extant by which he became Earl of Essex.
Those which I suppose to precede this were by the Empress. The first of
them passed in the short period during which Maud was in London, _i.e._
between June 24 and July 25, 1141. The second within a month after, at
Oxford. In the latter she alludes to grants of lands previously made by
Stephen to the said Geoffrey, but to no patent of earldom except her
own. Selden calls Maud's London patent the oldest on record. It is not
perhaps that, but it is older than this, though Dugdale thought not.
Having decided that Stephen's patent succeeded Maud's, it follows that
it (viz. this charter) passed after Nov. 1, 1141, when Stephen regained
his liberty and Geoffrey probably forsook the empress. The king was at
London on Dec. 7. In 1142 we are told (Lysons, _Camb._, 9) that this
Geoffrey and Earl Gilbert were sent by Stephen against the Isle of Ely.
He is called earl. We shall also have him attesting a charter of Queen
Matilda (Stephen's wife).
"In 1143 he was seized in Stephen's court at St. Alban's.
"In 1144 he is in high rebellion against Stephen, and an ally of Nigel,
Bishop of Ely. He is killed in Aug., 1144.
"On the whole then it would appear that the Empress first made him an
earl as a means of securing London, the stronghold of Stephen's party,
but that, on Stephen's release, the earl changed sides and Stephen
opposed Maud's policy by a counter-patent (we have usually found
counter-charters, however, to be Maud's). We have also a high
probability that this charter passed in Dec., 1141, or soon after; for
Stephen does not appear at London in 1142, when Geoffrey is earl and in
Stephen's employ."[116]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account