Geographic Variation in the Harvest Mouse, Reithrodontomys megalotis, On the Central Great Plains And in Adjacent RegionsJones, J. Knox
Science
Geographic Variation in the Harvest Mouse, Reithrodontomys megalotis, On the Central Great Plains And in Adjacent Regions
Jones, J. Knox
Animals -- Variation; Reithrodontomys
Color of pelage is remarkably uniform, considering the geographic extent
of the area involved, over most of the northern part of the central
grasslands. Perhaps this uniformity results partly from the predilection
of the western harvest mouse for grassy habitats, for in most areas on
the Great Plains the species is restricted to riparian communities,
principally along river systems, where soils, cover, and other
conditions approximate those of corresponding habitats farther to the
east to a much greater degree than do conditions in upland habitats.
Differential selective pressure, therefore, theoretically would be less
between eastern and western populations of _R. megalotis_ than in an
upland-inhabiting species. In any event, specimens from western
Nebraska, Wyoming, northern Colorado, and adjacent areas average only
slightly paler dorsally than specimens in corresponding pelages from the
eastern parts of Nebraska and Kansas, and many individuals from the two
areas can be matched almost exactly.
To the southwest, on the other hand, a trend toward paler (pale
brownish, less blackish) upper parts is apparent. Specimens from
southwestern Kansas and adjacent parts of Colorado and Oklahoma average
slightly paler in comparable pelages than specimens from northeastern
Kansas and eastern Nebraska, but most specimens from farther southwest,
in northern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado, are discernibly,
although not markedly, paler than mice from northern and eastern
populations.
A "pectoral spot," fairly common in some populations of _R. megalotis_
east of the Missouri River (see Hoffmeister and Warnock, 1955:162-163),
is present in only a small percentage of the specimens we have studied,
and when present is usually only faintly developed.
_External and Cranial Size_
[Illustration: FIG. 1. Geographic variation in five measurements of
_Reithrodontomys megalotis_ on the central Great Plains. The size of
each sample is given, along with total length, length of tail expressed
as a percentage of the head and body, length of ear, greatest length of
skull, and length of rostrum. The approximate distribution of the
species in the region shown and the approximate boundary between the
subspecies _R. m. aztecus_ and _R. m. dychei_ also are indicated.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account