Geology of Devils Tower National Monument, Wyoming: A Contribution to General GeologyRobinson, Charles Sherwood
Science
Geology of Devils Tower National Monument, Wyoming: A Contribution to General Geology
Robinson, Charles Sherwood
Geology -- Wyoming -- Devils Tower National Monument
ORIGIN OF DEVILS TOWER
The origin of Devils Tower has been a matter of speculation for many
years, and even today after detailed geologic mapping of the area, no
conclusive proof of its mode of origin can be presented.
Several theories of the origin have been proposed. One of the more
popular of these is that it is the neck of an extinct volcano
(Carpenter, 1888; Dutton and Schwartz, 1936). Another theory is that
Devils Tower and Missouri Buttes (a mass of the same type of rock about
4 miles northwest of the Tower) are the remnants of a laccolith (a
tabular intrusive igneous body, thickest in the middle, and with a
relatively level floor), the vent for which was under Missouri Buttes
(Jaggar, 1901, p. 264). Darton (1901, p. 69) believed that the Tower is
the remnant of a laccolith, smaller than the one proposed by Jaggar, the
feeding vent for which was underneath the Tower.
Much more detailed geologic work will have to be done in the surrounding
area before the mode of origin of Devils Tower may be proved
conclusively. The evidence gathered during the present investigation,
however, suggests that Devils Tower is a body of intrusive igneous rock,
which was never much larger in diameter than the present base of the
Tower, and which at depth (1,000 feet or more) is connected to a sill or
laccolith type body. The bases for this theory are—
1. The exposed portion of the Tower is the result of recent erosion.
At the time of its intrusion it was surrounded and probably
covered by several hundred feet of sedimentary rock.
2. The mineral composition and texture are more typical of shallow
intrusive rocks, which are formed at depth, than extrusive
rocks, which are formed on the surface.
3. No evidence of extrusive igneous activity has been found in the
surrounding area.
4. Missouri Buttes, about 4 miles to the northwest, and the Tower have
the same composition so it is assumed that they were derived
from a common magma; possibly the magma of a large intrusive
body, such as a laccolith or sill.
5. In a well drilled about 1½ miles southwest of Missouri Buttes, near
the center of a structural dome, rock similar to the Tower and
Missouri Buttes was encountered at about 1,400 feet below the
base of Missouri Buttes. Inasmuch as the thickness of the
sedimentary rocks in this area is normally much greater than
this depth, the rock in the drill hole probably represents an
intrusive body, rather than the Precambrian igneous rocks upon
which the younger sedimentary rocks were deposited.
6. The relatively small amount of talus, slope wash, or terrace gravel
derived from the Tower and Missouri Buttes suggests that they
have not been extensively eroded, and therefore the original
igneous bodies were not much larger than at present.
7.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account