Meredith, George, 1828-1909 -- Criticism and interpretation
The British race, we know, has never been remarkable for brilliancy,
nor, to any special degree, has it given evidence of perspicacity.
But nowhere has it shown such an inexcusable and comical consistency
of stupidity as in its slow recognition of Mr. Meredith, and its
blundering acceptance of him when once a few laudatory reviews have
revealed to it the existence of a prophet in its midst. We have
had among us for more than thirty years a giant, and a race of
pigmies, noted for nothing but the absence of genius, of even marked
individuality in their stream of literary production, that flows
on continuously and uneventfully, gape and blink at the odd sound
of his voice, and persist in regarding him as a grotesque monster.
He brings us the fruits of his colossal intellect in masterpiece
after masterpiece, and because he applies some hard knocks to our
understanding, never bright and always fearful of the new, we either
turn from him in cold neglect, or else we grow witty with the wit
of pigmies, at his expense, and accuse him ‘of breaking his shins
over his own wit.’ That which we do not understand, we decide, with
the superiority of the inane and the ignorant, to be not worthy the
understanding. Used as we have been to the lucid prose of Thackeray
and the brilliant vulgarity and homeliness of Dickens, spoiled as
our literary talent has been more recently by the flood of bloodless
fiction poured into the circulating libraries and fast bringing the
monthly magazines to a deadlock of incompetency and unimaginative
drivel, can we wonder, though we may deplore, that the taste for
excellence and vigour has diminished?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account