In 1883 while German traders were busy establishing a footing in Great
Namaqualand and Damaraland, diplomacy and intrigue had been at work
in the Transvaal. The Boer Government had concluded an agreement with
the Portuguese whereby they obtained an outlet to the east coast by a
railway to Delagoa Bay, and the Boers had begun to occupy portions of
Bechuanaland, separating the Transvaal and Namaqualand.
Boer Republics were proclaimed over the territories of several Bechuana
chiefs, and overtures were made by German emissaries from the Transvaal
to Lo Bengula for a concession over the territory under his sway.
[Illustration: SOUTH AFRICA IN 1883.
Showing the Transcontinental belt with which Germany
hoped to shut in Cape Colony and prevent northern
expansion.]
Tongaland and a portion of the Zululand coast, including St Lucia
Bay, was under the subjection of Dinizulu, who had succeeded Cetywayo
as King of Zululand, and with him negotiations were entered into,
the ultimate end of which was to be the cession to Germany (or the
Transvaal) of a portion of the sea-board.
The British Government can hardly really be blamed for not pursuing
in 1883 a vigorous policy of annexation in Southern Africa, for in
1879 there had been general native disturbances--including a costly
war with the Zulus, with its memorable disaster to the British arms at
Isandhlwana and the deplorable death of Prince Victor Napoleon. In 1881
we were defeated by the Boers at Laings Nek and Majuba, the little war
ending with a retirement quite the reverse of graceful; in 1882 Egypt
was in a foment, and although Sir Garnet Wolseley destroyed Ahmed Arabi
at Tel-el-Kebir, the Sudan was still overrun by frenzied fanatics.
The dilatoriness of the Imperial Government, however, is inexcusable in
view of the importance of the issue at stake, which was the overthrow
of British supremacy in South Africa in favour of Germany.
Fortunately for us, there were at the Cape imperially minded statesmen
who were fully alive to the danger threatening Great Britain: Sir
Bartle Frere, Cecil Rhodes, Sir Thomas Upington, and John X. Merriman;
and these continually pressed their views upon the Home Government,
while Rhodes, who had formulated his own ideas as to the destiny of the
sub-continent, set himself to employ his bounteous talents of mental
and physical energy to the due accomplishment of a purpose which he
made his life's aim.
Fortunately he had at his private command the financial resources
indispensable to the consummation of his ideals; for if he had had to
rely upon the Home Government for that support, his ambition stood
little hope of realisation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account