Germany, Turkey, and Armenia: A Selection of Documentary Evidence Relating to the Armenian Atrocities from German and other SourcesAnonymous
History
Germany, Turkey, and Armenia: A Selection of Documentary Evidence Relating to the Armenian Atrocities from German and other Sources
Anonymous
Armenian question; World War, 1914-1918 -- Armenia
In the days of Abd-ul-Hamid the "Dashnakzagan" were closely allied
with the Committee of Union and Progress, and several of the members
of that Committee received considerable help and protection from the
Armenians. Those among them, whose sense of gratitude was not entirely
destroyed by racial fanaticism, were therefore inclined to oppose the
sinister schemes of their less scrupulous colleagues. These schemes,
however, were the natural result of the tendencies which had gradually
gained the upper hand in the Committee of Union and Progress, which
Committee, as is well known, had met with considerable opposition
in some powerful sections of the Turkish population, and for the
sake of removing that opposition had been driven into a policy of
Pan-Islamism. This policy had already been proclaimed in a report
presented to the Congress of the Young Turk party held in 1911,
on which occasion it was urged that "sooner or later the complete
Ottomanisation of all Turkish subjects must be carried through,
but that it was clear that this object could never be obtained by
persuasion, and that the force of arms would have to be resorted
to." The nationalities in the said report are declared to be a
"quantité négligeable"; they might keep their religion, but not
their language.
The first symptoms of the fact that the advocates of the policy of
"thorough" against the Armenians had overcome the resistance of
their more scrupulous colleagues appeared on the 18/31 March, 1915,
when the press organ of the "Dashnakzagan" was suppressed. On the
12/25 April 235 leading Armenians were arrested in Constantinople
and deported. The excuse given by Talaat Bey to Vartkes, one of
the Armenian members of the Ottoman Parliament, shows: (1) that the
destruction of the Armenians had then been definitely decided on;
(2) that no act of disloyalty on the part of the Armenians could
have been adduced for the justification of this decision. These are
Talaat's words: "In the days of our weakness you put your knife
to our throat by raising the question of reform. For that reason
we will now avail ourselves of our present favourable situation,
for the purpose of scattering your people to such an extent that
for the next fifty years all thought of reforms will be driven out
of your heads." Vartkes thereupon said: "Then it is the intention
to continue the work of Abd-ul-Hamid?" Talaat laconically replied,
"Yes." As pointed out by the author of the Memorandum, the movement for
reform referred to by Talaat had for its only object the protection
of the life and property of the Armenians against the attacks of
Kurdish brigands; the reforms had been stipulated for by Art. 61 of
the Treaty of Berlin of 1878 and had been constantly supported by
the Great Powers, including Germany, which last named power had been
specially active in that behalf during the year 1913.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account