Giant brains; or, Machines that think — John Shaqi
Giant brains; or, Machines that thinkBerkeley, Edmund Callis
Science
Giant brains; or, Machines that think
Berkeley, Edmund Callis
Computers -- Popular works
Injuries to brains have shown some things of importance; for example,
they have shown that certain parts of the brain have certain duties.
There is a part of the brain, for instance, where sights are recorded
and compared. If an accident damages the part of the brain where
certain information is stored, the human being has to relearn—haltingly
and badly—the information destroyed.
We know also that thinking in the human brain is done essentially by a
process of storing information and then referring to it, by a process
of learning and remembering. We know that there are no little wheels
in the brain so that a wheel standing at 2 can be turned 3 more steps
and the result of 5 read. Instead, you and I store the information that
2 and 3 are 5, and store it in such a way that we can give the answer
when questioned. But we do not know the register in our brain where
this particular piece of information is stored. Nor do we know how,
when we are questioned, we are able automatically to pick up the nerve
channels that lead into this register, get the answer, and report it.
Since there are many nerves in the brain, about 10 billion of them, in
fact, we are certain that the network of connecting nerves is a main
part of the puzzle. We are therefore much interested in nerves and
their properties.
NERVES AND THEIR PROPERTIES
A single nerve, or _nerve cell_, consists of a _cell nucleus_ and
a _fiber_. This fiber may have a length of anything from a small
fraction of an inch up to several feet. In the laboratory, successive
impulses can be sent along a nerve fiber as often as 1000 a second.
Impulses can travel along a nerve fiber in either direction at a rate
from 3 feet to 300 feet a second. Because the speed of the impulse
is far less than 186,000 miles a second—the speed of an electric
current—the impulse in the nerve is thought by some investigators to be
more chemical than electrical.
We know that a nerve cell has what is called an _all-or-none response_,
like the trigger of a gun. If you stimulate the nerve up to a certain
point, nothing will happen; if you reach that point, or cross
it,—bang!—the nerve responds and sends out an impulse. The strength of
the impulse, like the shot of the gun, has no relation whatever to the
amount of the stimulation.
[Illustration: FIG. 1. Scheme of a nerve cell.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account