Giant brains; or, Machines that thinkBerkeley, Edmund Callis
Science
Giant brains; or, Machines that think
Berkeley, Edmund Callis
Computers -- Popular works
The cost of Eniac is higher than that of some of the other large
mechanical brains—over half a million dollars. Because some of the
work was done at the Moore School by students, the cost was probably
less than it otherwise would have been. The largest part of the cost
was the designing of the machine and the construction of the panels;
the tubes were only a small portion of the cost. The tubes used in
the calculating circuits cost only 20 to 90 cents. However, no later
electronic calculator need cost as much, for many improvements can now
be seen.
The power required for Eniac is about 150 kilowatts or about 200
horsepower, most of which is used for the heaters of the electronic
tubes. The largest number of electronic tubes mentioned for future
electronic calculators is about 3000, so we can see that they are
likely to use less than a quarter of the power needed for Eniac.
Eniac will doubtless give a number of years of successful operation
and be extremely useful for problems that employ its assets and are
not excluded by its limitations. In fact, at the Ballistic Research
Laboratories, for a typical week of actual work, Eniac has already
proved to be equal to 500 human computers working 40 hours with desk
calculating machines, and it appears that soon two or three times as
much work may be obtained from Eniac.
Chapter 8
RELIABILITY—NO WRONG RESULTS:
BELL LABORATORIES’ GENERAL-PURPOSE RELAY CALCULATOR
In 1946, Bell Telephone Laboratories in New York finished two
_general-purpose relay calculators_—mechanical brains. They were twins.
One was shipped in July 1946 to the National Advisory Committee for
Aeronautics at Langley Field, Virginia. The other, after some months of
trial operation, was shipped in February 1947 to the Ballistic Research
Laboratories at the U. S. Army’s Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Md.
Each machine is remarkably reliable and versatile. It can do a wide
variety of calculations in a great many different ways. Yet the machine
never takes a new step without a check that the old step was correctly
performed. There is, therefore, a chance of better than 99.999,999,999
per cent that the machine will not let a wrong result come out. The
automatic checking, of course, does not prevent (1) human mistakes—for
example, instructing the machine incorrectly—or (2) mechanical
failures, in which the machine stops dead in its tracks, letting no
result at all come out.
ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT
In Bell Telephone Laboratories the telephone system of the country is
continually studied. Their research produced the common type of dial
telephone system: a masterly machine for selecting information.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account