Gillingwater's History of Lowestoft: a reprint: with a chapter of more recent eventsGillingwater, Edmund
History
Gillingwater's History of Lowestoft: a reprint: with a chapter of more recent events
Gillingwater, Edmund
Lothingland (England); Lowestoft (England)
days; for soon after, as, on the Lord’s day, he was preaching to his
congregation, he was suddenly taken ill, was obliged to be led home, and
died in a short time. Mr. Alderson was a worthy, well-disposed man, of
an exceedingly affable and peaceable disposition, much esteemed by the
whole circle of his acquaintance; and as he lived much respected, so he
died universally lamented.
The Dissenting congregation at Lowestoft appears to have been but very
small before the year 1689, when Mr. Emlyn became their officiating
minister; after this period they became a more numerous body, and
continued increasing till the year 1735, when their number was become
very considerable; after that year they appear to have been in a
decreasing state, and declined very fast, especially since the death of
Mr. Alderson; for, according to an account taken in 1776, the number
amounted to only 35, that could be properly called Independents and
Congregational Dissenters. The number of Dissenting families in 1780 to
1790 (exclusive of the Methodists) was under twenty, but the congregation
usually consisted of 150 and 200 persons.
While the law suit was pending, and for a short time after the death of
Mr. Alderson, the congregation at Lowestoft was under the care of the
Rev. Nasmith. After Mr. Nasmith came Mr. Gardner. From 1760 to 1785
about fifteen ministers had charge of the Dissenting congregation.
A digression may be interesting respecting an extraordinary trial,
concerning two poor old widows belonging to Lowestoft who were tried,
condemned, and executed on a charge of witch-craft.
In the year 1663 Mr. Samuel Pacey, an eminent Dissenter at Lowestoft,
commenced a prosecution against two widows, on a suspicion of witchcraft.
Mr. Pacey had conceived an opinion that two of his daughters, Elizabeth
and Deborah, respectively eleven and nine years of age, were bewitched;
and that these two women, whose names were Rose Cullender and Amy Duny,
were the cause of the misfortune. In consequence of this suspicion, he
caused Amy Duny to be set in the stocks; but not thinking this a
sufficient punishment, he caused both women to be apprehended; and at the
ensuing Lent assizes, held at Bury, the 10th March, 1664, before Sir
Matthew Hale, Knt., Lord Chief Baron of his Majesty’s Court of Exchequer,
they were severally indicted for bewitching (amongst others) the said
Elizabeth and Deborah Pacey; and being arraigned on the said indictment,
pleaded not guilty; but being afterwards, after a long course of
evidence, found guilty, they were thereupon, on Thursday, March 13th,
sentenced to die for the same, and accordingly, on Monday, the 17th of
March following, they were executed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account