[Footnote 224: i. 1. 17. On Cusanus _v._ Falckenberg, _Grundzüge
der Philosophie des Nicolaus Cusanus_, 1880, Uebinger, _Philosophie
des N. C._, 1880, and _Gotteslehre des N. C._, 1888, F. J. Clemens,
_Giord. Bruno und Nikolaus von Cusa_, 1847, Scharpff, _Des N. von C.
wichstigste Schriften_, 1862.]
[Footnote 225: _Infinito_, Lag. 348.]
[Footnote 226: Cf. Cusanus' _De docta ignorantia_.]
[Footnote 227: _Spaccio_, Lag. 420.]
[Footnote 228: _De docta ignorantia_, i. 7. _Alchoran_, ii. 7, 8.]
[Footnote 229: _Doct. ignor._ ii. 7.]
[Footnote 230: _De Possest._]
[Footnote 231: _Alchoran_, ii. 6.]
[Footnote 232: Cusanus, _De Ludo globi_, bk. i.]
[Footnote 233: Cusanus, _De Idiota_, iii. (_De Mente_, 9).]
[Footnote 234: Cusanus, _De Conjecturis_, i. 4.]
[Footnote 235: _Id. De Visione Dei_, 10.]
[Footnote 236: _Id. De Venatione Sapientiae._]
[Footnote 237: _De occulta philosophia._]
[Footnote 238: _De Vanitate Scientiarum._]
[Footnote 239: Tocco. _Fonti piu recenti_, etc. p. 534.]
[Footnote 240: Theophrastus Bombastes von Hohenheim, 1493-1541.]
[Footnote 241: Lag. 247.]
[Footnote 242: i. 1. 17. In the _Sig. Sig._ ii. 2. 181, he
is put forward as an example of the value of the life of
solitude:--"Paracelsus, who glories more in the title of hermit than in
that of doctor or master, became a leader and author among physicians,
second to none"--a reference to the title of _Eremita_, which
Paracelsus took, however, from his birthplace Einsiedeln, and to his
well known and strongly expressed contempt for the learning of books.]
[Footnote 243: 1501-1576 /A.D./]
[Footnote 244: The first two books of the _De natura rerum_ were
published in 1565.]
[Footnote 245: _Op. Lat._ i. 1. 17.]
[Footnote 246: _Cena_, Lag. 124.]
[Footnote 247: Bruno praises and gives long extracts from Copernicus in
the _De Immenso_, bk. iii. ch. 9.]
[Footnote 248: _De la Causa_, etc.]
[Footnote 249: Lag. 229.]
[Footnote 250: Lag. 229.]
[Footnote 251: _De la Causa, principio et uno_, 1584.]
[Footnote 252: Lag. 230.]
[Footnote 253: _Ib._ The terms correspond to Aristotle's [Greek:
archê] and [Greek: aition], respectively; no clear distinction was
drawn between their meanings by Aristotle, however. Bruno's aim is
to contrast the inwardly active, _immanent_ principle of life and of
movement with the _transient_, outwardly active cause, and to interpret
nature, as a whole, as the manifestation of some such inward principle,
rather than as a mechanical system to which the impulse was given from
without.]
[Footnote 254: Lag. 231. 38. The _Intellectus_ is identified also with
the Pythagorean world-mover (Verg. _Aeneid_, vi. 726); the "World's
Eye" of the Orphic Poems; the "distinguisher" of Empedocles; the
"Father and Progenitor of all things" of Plotinus.]
[Footnote 255: Lag. 232. 24.]
[Footnote 256: Lag. 232. 33 ff.]
[Footnote 257: On Perfection, _vide infra_, p. 199.]
[Footnote 258: Lag. 233. 27. Cf. Arist. _De Anima_, ii. 1.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account