Gleanings in Europe : $b Italy, vol. 2 of 2Cooper, James Fenimore
General
Gleanings in Europe : $b Italy, vol. 2 of 2
Cooper, James Fenimore
Cooper, James Fenimore, 1789-1851 -- Travel -- Italy; Italy -- Description and travel
The calm of Lent succeeded to the fun and clamour of the Carnival. I
ought to have said however, that the people of quality terminate the
festivities by meeting in _petits comités_, and supping _gras_. The
observances of the Lent have not struck me as being much more rigid than
elsewhere, though the religious rites have been more general, and were
conducted with greater pomp than is usual even among the Catholics. When
Passion Week arrived, however, we saw we were in the centre of
Christendom. Palm Sunday was a great day, all the cardinals appearing in
the Sistine Chapel, bearing palms. On this occasion, an Englishman, a
Mr. Weld, appeared as a cardinal; the first of his nation, I believe,
since the death of Cardinal York. This gentleman was a layman, has been
married, and has descendants now in this place. He is a man of fortune,
and of one of the old English Catholic families.
Several popular errors exist in relation to the rules of the Romish
Church. The Canonical orders are precisely the same as our own, being
merely those of bishop, priest, and deacon. All above and below these
are merely additions, which, it is admitted, have been devised by the
Church, for its own convenience, in the way of government; just as the
Church of England has created archbishops, archdeacons, deans, vicars,
rectors, curates, &c. The Archbishop of Canterbury and the Pope, in a
religious sense, are merely bishops. It is not necessary, I believe,
that a cardinal should be even in holy orders at all. Most of them are,
but I understand the rule is not absolute. I do not know that Mr. Weld
has ever been ordained. The functions of a cardinal are properly of a
civil nature, though they are intimately connected with the government
of the church. They are ecclesiastics and cannot marry; but it is said
cardinals have retired, and then married. One or two of these have been
named to me.
It is usually, almost invariably the case, that the Pope is taken from
the Holy College; but it is not constitutionally necessary. You or I
might be elected Pope; but, previously to induction or installation, we
should be required to enter the Romish Church by Romish baptism, and
then pass through the several orders of deacon, priest, and bishop. The
Pope is bishop of Rome in a canonical sense, and, in virtue of that
office, head of the Roman Catholic Church. The cardinals are classed
among themselves as cardinal bishops, cardinal priests, and cardinal
deacons; but this is not their clerical rank. Thus, Cardinal Fesch, who
is archbishop of Lyons, appears in the list as only a cardinal priest.
Cardinal Albani, the secretary of state, is a cardinal deacon, has no
bishopric, and was once married. I presume he is not even in holy
orders.
The notion that the Pope must be an Italian is false, of course, there
being no constitutional restriction on the choice of the Holy College.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account