Gleanings of a Mystic: A Series of Essays on Practical MysticismHeindel, Max
Religion
Gleanings of a Mystic: A Series of Essays on Practical Mysticism
Heindel, Max
Rosicrucians
One writes to Headquarters: “I have given up flesh eating, and I long
to live the ascetic life, far from the world’s noise that jars upon me.
I want to give my life for humanity.” Another says: “I want to live the
spiritual life, but I have a wife who needs my care and support. Do
you think I would be justified in leaving her to help my fellow men?”
Still another says: “I am in a business which is unspiritual; every
day I must do things which are against my higher nature, but I have a
daughter dependent upon me for an education. What shall I do: continue
or give up?” There are of course many other problems presented to us,
but these serve as fair samples, for they represent a class which is
ready to give up the world at the slightest word of encouragement,
and rush off to the hills in the expectation of sprouting wings
immediately. If the people who are in that class have any ties, they
break them without a scruple or a moment’s consideration.
Another class still feels some obligation, but could be easily
persuaded to repudiate it in order that they might live what they call
“the spiritual life.” It cannot be denied that when people get into
this state of mind, when they lose their ambition to work in the world,
when they become shiftless and neglectful of their duties, they merit
the reproach of the community.
But as already said such conduct is based upon a misunderstanding of
the higher teachings and is not at all sanctioned by the Bible or the
Elder Brothers.
It is a step in the right direction when a person ceases to feed on
flesh because he feels compassion for the suffering of the animals.
There are many people who abstain from flesh foods for health’s sake,
but theirs being a selfish motive, the sacrifice carries with it no
merit. Where the aspirant to the higher life is prompted to abstain
from flesh food because he realizes that the refining influence of a
meatless diet upon the body will aid him in his quest by making the
body more sensitive to spiritual influences, there is no real merit
either. Truly, the person who abstains from flesh foods for the sake
of health will be much benefited, and the person who abstains to make
his body more sensitive will also get his reward in that respect, but
from the spiritual point of view neither will be very much better. On
the other hand, whoever abstains from flesh food because he realizes
that God’s life is immanent in every animal just as in himself, that
in the final analysis God feels all suffering felt by the animal, that
it is a divine law, “Thou shalt not kill,” and that he must abstain
out of compassion, this person is not only benefited in health and by
making his body more sensitive to spiritual impacts, but because of the
motive which prompts him he reaps a reward in soul growth immeasurably
more precious than any other consideration. Therefore we would say by
all means abstain from flesh food, but be sure to do so prompted by the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account