Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth century — John Shaqi
Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth centuryAnonymous
History
Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth century
Anonymous
Civilization, Medieval
From this slight review of well attested facts, it must be evident to
the reader, that Roman civilisation, immediately before the fall of
the empire, was thoroughly corrupt. Every one will discern, in that
corruption, enough to account for the prostration of the proud
imperial city, beneath the power of barbarians. But the Christian
mind will further recognise, in the facts of this memorable case, the
operations of one of the established laws of Divine Providence. The
full punishment of individual men for their transgressions in this
life, is reserved for a future state of being; but as nations in
their collective capacity, will have no existence hereafter, the
punishments of their sins is sure to be inflicted upon them sooner or
later in the present world. The retributive justice of God is as
clearly to be seen in the overthrow of Rome, as in the extirpation of
the Canaanites, or the fall of Jerusalem.
[1] Guizot's Lect. on Civilisation, lect. 2.
[2] Manual of Ancient History. Oxf. p. 450.
[3] Gibbon, vol. iv. p. 94.
[4] Pompeii, vol. ii. p. 13.
[5] Ammianus Marcellinus.
[6] Ammianus Marcellinus. lib. xiv. c. 25.
[7] Gibbon gives a full view of the state of Roman society, ch. xxxi.
of his "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire."
[8] Giesler, vol. i. p. 298.
[9] Ammianus Marcellinus, lib. lxxvii. c. 3.
[10] Ammianus Marcellinus, lib. xiv. c. 6.
SECTION III.
BARBARIANS.
The Goths, the first of the barbarians who invaded Rome, were
descended from one of those tribes whom Tacitus has described in his
valuable treatise on the manners of the Germans. They were wandering
hordes, neglecting agriculture, living upon the produce of the chase,
and upon their prolific flocks and herds. Unlike the now effeminate
Romans, they were hardy and robust. War was their business, conquest
their delight, and the sword and buckler their choicest ornaments.
Freedom was their birthright, and the power of their rulers was
curbed by considerable limitations. In peace, their princes were
bound to consult them on all affairs of government, and in war, it
was left to the soldier to choose the standard under which he would
enlist: but once pledged to a particular chief, no dangers or
allurements could induce him to desert. A spirit of fidelity and
freedom mingled with their ferocious habits, and formed the national
characteristic of this remarkable race. The lapse of some three
centuries, intercourse with the Romans during the latter part of that
period, and the professed adoption of the Arian form of Christianity,
had no doubt, in some measure, modified the Gothic character; and if
we are to admit the statement of Salvian, a writer of that period, it
would further appear that the morals of the barbarians were of a
higher tone than those of the empire. Still there can be no doubt
that they retained much of their original fierce independence of
character.[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account