Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth centuryAnonymous
History
Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth century
Anonymous
Civilization, Medieval
whom a line of military pontiffs, military in spirit, if not in act,
were the proud pretended successors: "Put up again thy sword into its
place; for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."
From what has been already stated, some conclusion may be drawn
respecting the morals of the middle ages. The impostures which were
frequently countenanced and even practised by the clergy, and the
palpable falsehoods which were propagated by them in the legendary
tales of the saints, evince a most deplorable disregard of truth, the
very first of virtues. There is scarcely anything that strikes the
reader more forcibly, on looking into the records of this dark
period, than the general moral obtuseness of feeling which prevailed
relative to the guilt of practising deception and telling lies.
Connected with this disregard of truth was an equal disregard of the
principles of justice. Complaints were made, as early as the sixth
century, of bishops who had appropriated to their own use endowments
conferred on the church, and who were guilty of various acts of
injustice and oppression. Instances of unjust conduct abound in the
annals of monkish historians, and sometimes acts of shameful perfidy
are recorded, as if they were by no means immoral. In the history of
Ramsey Abbey, there is related a strange anecdote of a bishop who
made a Danish nobleman drunk, that he might cheat him out of an
estate--an exploit which the ecclesiastical historian records with
much approbation.[2] In further illustration of the want of truth
and justice, on the part of many of the clergy, may be noticed the
notorious prevalence of simony, that evil with which the famous
Hildebrand so vigorously grappled. It is not in its spiritual
character, as a sin of most heinous magnitude against the Head of the
church, that we notice it now, but as a crime against the laws of
society. Ecclesiastical benefices were in fact social trusts--trusts
to be employed for the good of mankind; and, therefore, when they
were made mere matters of bargain and sale, an entire disregard to
public rights was openly proclaimed. But the heaviest element of
social guilt in the sin of simony, is to be found in the practice of
perjury which it invariably involved. Ecclesiastical law severely
condemned simony, and looking at the law we might imagine that the
practice was never tolerated; but looking only at the practice so
common among churchmen, and so little checked, except now and then by
some bold reformer, we might suppose no law against it was in
existence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account