Gods of Modern Grub Street: Impressions of Contemporary Authors — John Shaqi
Gods of Modern Grub Street: Impressions of Contemporary AuthorsAdcock, Arthur St. John
History
Gods of Modern Grub Street: Impressions of Contemporary Authors
Adcock, Arthur St. John
English fiction -- 20th century -- History and criticism; English literature -- 20th century -- History and criticism
Belloc began quietly enough, in 1895, with a little unimportant book of
“Verses and Sonnets.” He followed this in the next four years with four
delightfully, irresponsibly absurd books of verses and pictures such
as “The Bad Child’s Book of Beasts,” “More Beasts for Worse Children,”
publishing almost simultaneously in 1899 “The Moral Alphabet” and his
notable French Revolution study of “Danton.” In a later year he gave us
simultaneously the caustic, frivolous “Lambkin’s Remains” and his book
on “Paris,” and followed it with his able monograph on “Robespierre.”
It was less unsettling, no doubt, when “Caliban’s Guide to Letters” was
closely succeeded by the first and most powerful of his ironic novels,
“Emanuel Burden,” but serious people have never known where to have
him. He collects his essays under such careless titles as “On Nothing,”
“On Anything,” “This and That,” or simply “On”; and the same year that
found him collaborating with Cecil Chesterton in a bitter attack on
“The Party System,” found him collaborating with Lord Basil Blackwood
in the farcical “More Peers,” and issuing acute technical expositions
of the battles of Blenheim and Malplaquet.
His novels, “Emanuel Burden,” “Mr. Clutterbuck’s Election,” “A Change
in the Cabinet,” “The Mercy of Allah,” and the rest, satirize the
chicanery and humbug rampant in modern commerce, finance, politics, and
general society, and are too much in earnest to attempt to tickle the
ears of the groundlings.
For four years, in the first decade of the century, Belloc sat in
Parliament as Member for Salford, but the tricks, hypocrisies,
insincerities of the politicians disgusted and exasperated him; he
was hampered and suppressed in the House by its archaic forms, and
instead of staying there stubbornly to leaven the unholy lump he came
wrathfully out, washing his hands of it, to attack the Party system
in the Press, and inaugurate _The Witness_ in which he proceeded to
express himself on the iniquities of public life forcefully and with
devastating candor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account