Goethe's literary essays : $b A selection in EnglishGoethe, Johann Wolfgang von
History
Goethe's literary essays : $b A selection in English
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von
Art; Literature -- History and criticism
I cannot embark in similitudes, said my guest, and from your own words,
moreover, it is evident that beauty is something incomprehensible, or
the effect of something incomprehensible. What cannot be comprehended
is naught; what we cannot make clear by words is nonsense.
_I._--Can you then clearly express in words the effect that a colored
body produces on your eyes?
_He._--That is again a metaphor that I will not be drawn into. It is
enough that character can be indicated. You find no beauty without
it, else it would be empty and insignificant. All the beauty of the
Ancients is only Character, and only out of this quality is beauty
developed.
Our Philosopher[4] had arrived meanwhile and was conversing with my
nieces, when, hearing us speak earnestly, he stepped forward; and the
stranger, stimulated by the accession of a new hearer, proceeded:
That is just the misfortune when good heads, when people of merit, get
hold of such false principles, which have only an appearance of truth,
and spread them wider and wider. None appropriate them so willingly as
those who know and understand nothing of the subject. Thus has Lessing
fastened upon us the principle that the ancients cultivated only
the beautiful; thus has Winckelmann put us to sleep with his “noble
simplicity and serene greatness”; whereas the art of the ancients
appears in all imaginable forms. But these gentlemen tarry by Jupiter
and Juno, Genii and Graces, and hide the ignoble forms and skulls of
Barbarians, the rough hair, foul beard, gaunt bones, and wrinkled skin
of deformed age, the protruding veins and hanging breasts.
In the name of God, I exclaimed, are there then independent,
self-existing works of the best age of Ancient Art that exhibit such
frightful objects? Or are they not rather subordinate works, occasional
pieces, creations of an art that must demean itself according to
outward circumstances, an art on the decline?
_He._--I give you the specification, you can yourself search and judge.
But you will not deny that the Laocoon, that Niobe, that Dirce with her
stepsons, are self-subsistent works of art. Stand before the Laocoon
and contemplate nature in full revolt and desperation. The last choking
pang, the desperate struggle, the maddening convulsion, the working
of the corroding poison, the vehement fermenting, the stagnating
circulation, suffocating pressure, and paralytic death.
The Philosopher seemed to look at me with astonishment, and I answered:
We shudder, we are horrified at the bare description. In sooth, if it
be so with the group of Laocoon, what are we to say of the pleasure we
find in this as in every other true work of art? But I will not meddle
in the question. You must settle it with the authors of the _Propylæa_,
who are of just the opposite mind.
It must be admitted, said my guest, that all Antiquity speaks for
me; for where do horror and death rage more hideously than in the
representation of the Niobe?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account