Good-bye to all that : $b An autobiographyGraves, Robert
History
Good-bye to all that : $b An autobiography
Graves, Robert
Authors, English -- 20th century -- Biography; Graves, Robert, 1895-1985; World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives, British
story, but swore it was true, because he had seen the head.
We discussed the continuity of regimental _morale_. A captain in a
line battalion of one of the Surrey regiments said: ‘It all depends on
the reserve battalion at home.’ He had had a year’s service when the
war broke out; the battalion, which had been good, had never recovered
from the first battle of Ypres. He said: ‘What’s wrong with us is that
we have a rotten depot. The drafts are bad and so we get a constant
re-infection.’ He told me one night in our sleeping hut: ‘In both the
last two attacks that we made I had to shoot a man of my company to
get the rest out of the trench. It was so bloody awful that I couldn’t
stand it. It’s the reason why I applied to be sent down here.’ This
was not the usual loose talk that one heard at the base. He was a good
fellow and he was speaking the truth. I was sorrier for Phillips—that
was not his name—than for any other man I met in France. He deserved
a better regiment. There was never any trouble with the Royal Welch
like that. The boast of every good battalion in France was that it
had never lost a trench; both our battalions made it. This boast had
to be understood broadly; it meant never having been forced out of a
trench by an enemy attack without recapturing it before the action
ended. Capturing a German trench and being unable to hold it for lack
of reinforcements did not count, nor did retirement from a trench by
order or when the battalion of the left or right had broken and left a
flank in the air. And in the final stages of the war trenches could be
honourably abandoned as being entirely obliterated by bombardment,
or because not really trenches at all, but a line of selected
shell-craters.
We all agreed on the value of arms-drill as a factor in _morale_.
‘Arms-drill as it should be done,’ someone said, ‘is beautiful,
especially when the company feels itself as a single being and each
movement is not a movement of every man together, but a single movement
of one large creature.’ I used to have big bunches of Canadians to
drill four or five hundred at a time. Spokesmen came forward once and
asked what sense there was in sloping and ordering arms and fixing and
unfixing bayonets. They said they had come to France to fight and not
to guard Buckingham Palace. I told them that in every division of the
four in which I had served there had been three different kinds of
troops. Those that had guts but were no good at drill; those that were
good at drill but had no guts; and those that had guts and were good at
drill. These last fellows were, for some reason or other, much the best
men in a show. I didn’t know why and I didn’t care. I told them that
when they were better at fighting than the Guards’ Division they could
perhaps afford to neglect their arms-drill.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account