Good Health and How We Won It, With an Account of the New HygieneSinclair, Upton
Science
Good Health and How We Won It, With an Account of the New Hygiene
Sinclair, Upton
Hygiene
One of the writers has told of his experience many years ago, when he
went to a physician and requested to be helped in keeping well. He went
to Battle Creek Sanitarium on account of the illness of his wife, and
when one of the physicians proposed to him that he himself undergo the
treatments, he answered (having in mind this earlier experience, and of
the doubts it had bred in him), “There is nothing the matter with me at
present that I know of.” The answer of the Sanitarium physician was,
“The less there is the matter with you the better, from our point of
view.” And so he realized that at last he had found a place where his
own idea of health-preservation was understood.
He accepted joyfully the offer to assist him in getting a scientific
understanding of his own bodily condition. A drop of his blood was
taken and analyzed, microscopically and chemically. He went to the
diet table, and for three days ate precisely measured quantities of
specified foods; during the period all his excretions were weighed
and analyzed and examined under the microscope. A thorough physical
examination was made, and also a series of tests, upon a machine
invented by Dr. Kellogg, to register the strength of each group of
muscles of the body. The results of all these examinations were
presented to him in an elaborate set of reports and charts, together
with a prescription for treatments, diet and exercise. He had stated
that there was nothing the matter with him, so far as he knew. He found
that anaerobes—the dangerous bacterial inhabitants of the intestinal
tract—numbered something over four billion to the gram of intestinal
contents—a gram being about a thirtieth part of an ounce. During the
six weeks of his stay at the Sanitarium the more important of these
tests were repeated weekly; and when he left, the number of anaerobes
had been reduced nearly ninety per cent.
Dr. Kellogg terms the system of treatment employed by the Sanitarium
the Physiologic Method, and he writes of it as follows:
“The Physiologic Method consists in the treatment of the sick by
natural, physical, or physiologic means scientifically applied.
“The haphazard or empirical use of water, electricity, Swedish
movements, and allied measures is not the Physiologic Method. It is no
method at all. It is empiricism, at best; at its worst, it is quackery.
The application of the Physiologic Method requires much more than
simply a knowledge of the technique of baths, electricity, movements,
etc. It requires a thorough knowledge of physiology, and an intelligent
grasp of all the resources of modern medical science. For, while the
Physiologic Method depends for its curative effects upon those natural
agencies which are the means of preserving health, and which may be
relied upon to prevent disease as well as to cure, it recognizes and
employs as supplementary remedies, all rational means which have by
experience been proved to be effective.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account