Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's ReignAshton, John
History
Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's Reign
Ashton, John
Great Britain -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
“My cuss upon Lord Melbun, and
On Jonny Russ-all-so,
That forc’d me from my native land,
Across the waves to go-o-oh!
But all their spiteful arts is wain,
My spirit down to keep;
I hopes I’ll soon git back again,
To take another peep.”
To follow Chronology compels me to turn suddenly from gay to grave
topics. In September, 1833, Newman commenced the _Tracts for the Times_,
which, according to its advertisement, had the object of “contributing
something towards the practical revival of doctrines (such as the
Apostolic Succession, and the Holy Catholic Church) which, although held
by the great divines of our Church, have become practically obsolete with
the majority of her members.” Keble and others joined him at once, as
did Pusey as soon as the state of his health permitted, together with
nearly all the advanced thinkers at Oxford. These Tracts, issued from
time to time, caused a mighty upheaval in the Church of England, which
was known as the “Tractarian movement,” the effects of which have lasted
to this day, as may be witnessed in the vast extension of Church
building, the larger attendance and more devout behaviour of
congregations, the brighter and more ornate services, which are so great
a contrast to the general sleepiness both of pastor and flock which then
existed.
Some of these Tracts went farther than people were, as yet, able to
follow, they were “strong meat for babes,” and the publication of Tract
XC., by Newman, on the Thirty-nine Articles, brought things to a climax,
and on 15 March, the Vice-Chancellor and the Heads of Houses met to
censure the publication; they came to the resolution: “That modes of
interpretation, such as are suggested in the said Tract, evading rather
than explaining the sense of the Thirty-nine Articles, and reconciling
subscription to them, with the adoption of errors which they were
designed to counteract, defeat the object, and are inconsistent with the
due observance of the Statutes of the University.” They only expressed
their opinion which was all they could do, but Newman avowed the
authorship of the Tract, and whilst he was still unconvinced of his
error, he wrote, “I am sincerely sorry for the trouble and anxiety I have
given to the members of the Board, and I beg to return my thanks to them,
for an act which, even though founded on misapprehension, may be made as
profitable to myself, as it is religiously and charitably intended.”
At this time, neither the writers of the Tracts, nor their readers, had
any intention of severing themselves from the Church of England, their
sole endeavours were to wake it from the torpor into which it had fallen;
and, had there been any tolerance on the other side, such men as Newman,
Manning, and others, would have been kept to the Church, for they merely
enunciated doctrine and practices which are now almost universal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account