Governor Bradford's first dialogue : $b A dialogue, or the sum of a conference between some young men born in New England and sundry ancient men that came out of Holland and old England, anno Domini 1648.Bradford, William
History
Governor Bradford's first dialogue : $b A dialogue, or the sum of a conference between some young men born in New England and sundry ancient men that came out of Holland and old England, anno Domini 1648.
Bradford, William
Pilgrims (New Plymouth Colony) -- Early works to 1800; Separatists
Old South Leaflets.
TWELFTH SERIES, 1894. No. 2.
[Illustration]
Governor Bradford’s
First
Dialogue.
A DIALOGUE, OR THE SUM OF A CONFERENCE BETWEEN SOME YOUNG MEN
BORN IN NEW ENGLAND AND SUNDRY ANCIENT MEN THAT CAME OUT OF
HOLLAND AND OLD ENGLAND, ANNO DOMINI 1648.[1]
_Young men._--Gentlemen, you were pleased to appoint us this time
to confer with you, and to propound such questions as might give us
satisfaction in some things wherein we are ignorant, or at least
further light to some things that are more obscure unto us. Our first
request therefore is, to know your minds concerning the true and simple
meaning of those of _The Separation_, as they are termed, when they say
the Church of England is no Church, or no true Church.
_Ancient men._--For answer hereunto, first, you must know that they
speak of it as it then was under the hierarchical prelacy, which since
have been put down by the State, and not as it is now unsettled.
2. They nowhere say, that we remember, that they are no Church. At
least, they are not so to be understood; for they often say the
contrary.
3. When they say it is no true Church of Christ, they do not at all
mean as they are the elect of God, or a part of the Catholic Church, or
of the mystical body of Christ, or visible Christians professing faith
and holiness (as most men understand the church); for which purpose
hear what Mr. Robinson in his Apology, page 53. “If by the Church,”
saith he, “be understood the Catholic Church, dispersed upon the face
of the whole earth, we do willingly acknowledge that a singular part
thereof, and the same visible and conspicuous, is to be found in the
land, and with it do profess and practise, what in us lies, communion
in all things in themselves lawful, and done in right order.”
4. Therefore they mean it is not a true church as it is a National
Church, combined together of all in the land promiscuously under the
hierarchical government of archbishops, their courts and canons, so far
differing from the primitive pattern in the Gospel.
_Young men._--Wherein do they differ then from the judgment or practice
of our churches here in New England?
_Ancient men._--Truly, for matter of practice, nothing at all that is
in any thing material; these being rather more strict and rigid in some
proceedings about admission of members, and things of such nature, than
the other; and for matter of judgment, it is more, as we conceive, in
words and terms, than matter of any great substance; for the churches
and chief of the ministers here hold that the National Church, so
constituted and governed as before is said, is not allowable according
to the primitive order of the Gospel; but that there are some parish
assemblies that are true churches by virtue of an implicit covenant
amongst themselves, in which regard the Church of England may be held
and called a true church.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account