Graham's Magazine, Vol. XIX, No. 3, September 1841 — John Shaqi
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XIX, No. 3, September 1841Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XIX, No. 3, September 1841
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
It is pretty certain, however that no person on the globe, at the period
of his life, had any _just_ appreciation of him. Notwithstanding the
triumphant success of his career, and the high honor and opulence he
attained, his real character, as such a mighty patriarch of literature,
was not dreamed of either by himself or any of his contemporaries. As a
mind impregnated with a fire nearly beyond the mortal sphere—as one
whose birth was an event in which mankind were personally
interested—who was to give a name to his age—who, at that point of his
posthumous celebrity where other great men begin to recede into the
shadows of the past, was to start up anew, in more living distinctness
and intellectual splendor—was to pass in this apotheoside grandeur over
the usually impenetrable barriers of nations and languages, and to
become (like some of the universal and ever-enduring elements of
nature—like light, fire or air) a constant pleasure and nutriment to
the human mind—as this extraordinary, and, I may say, _mysterious_
being—no one knew him. His _full_ brightness was veiled not only from
his contemporary friends and admirers, but, as is now universally
acknowledged, from many of his most distinguished subsequent editors and
commentators. The rapturous eulogies, the commendatory verses, the
folios on folios written upon him—extravagant as they are—fall short
of his _true_ value. Even Johnson, Warburton, Theobald, Pope, and the
rest of his commentators of the same rank, appear to have meted out to
him less than the deserved measure of praise. It appears that the
_comparative_ smallness of their minds (I mean comparative with
Shakspeare’s) did not permit them to comprehend the complete dimensions
of the subject they had undertaken. They have all too much the air of
critics, instead of humble followers and pupils. They assume a
familiarity with him which their relative nature did not warrant. There
is a greater difference between him and any one who has lived with him
or subsequent to him, considered as two _minds_, than is always
understood by those who even confine themselves to panegyric.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account