Graham's Magazine, Vol. XIX, No. 5, November 1841Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XIX, No. 5, November 1841
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
The doctor is also done to the life. He is, in all respects, not only
the medical man, but the medical man of coolness and experience. The few
words he utters are full of curiosity, but not of the unbridled horror
of his companion. He has doubtless, before, witnessed scenes enough of
pain and anguish, and he is at first disposed to consider the
gentlewoman as an exaggerator of the mysteries she professes to have
beheld, and to treat the whole thing physically as a disease, till the
truth becomes too apparent, and even his cool mind is convinced.
Lady Macbeth herself is the very _ne plus ultra_ of the tragic. She has
more terror in her step and eye, than a mere mortal ever had before.
Waking remorse would not have been, by any means, so appalling. The fact
of her being asleep is a great accessory. That pale face—those fixed,
staring, dead eyes—the countenance emaciated by disease, and the long
consuming fire of conscience—the step, solemn, slow, measured and
unearthly—and the dark, dim and shifting imagery of the past, which
floats to and fro through her imagination, form altogether a spectacle
shocking and almost insupportable.
Let us take this extraordinary scene to pieces, and examine a little
into its mechanism. One of the wonders of it is that there is no resort
to _style_—no description—no bursts of eloquence—no lava-like
eruption of passions. There are indeed but very few words said at all.
The sick lady has, at first, no terrors for the doctor, and the
gentlewoman has often beheld the same thing before. There is no stage
effect—no management—no melo-dramatic cunning. The doctor even shows
his coolness and incredulity, and makes a careless general remark. The
transcendant genius of the poet felt, intuitively, that the situation of
his characters here was so complete as to absorb the reader, and render
unnecessary any but the simplest language. The whole scene is quiet,
hushed and professional. Even the blank verse of the rest of the tragedy
is laid aside, and the characters speak in common-place perfectly
natural prose. Let us see what this almost supernatural terror consists
in.
The doctor first says, we may suppose with a certain half unintentional
degree of disappointment, that he has been already watching two nights
to see something which the waiting-woman has reported to him respecting
the queen, and yet he has seen nothing.
“I have two nights watched with you, but can perceive no truth
in your report.”
A little impatient, a little incredulous, perhaps, he adds:
“When was it she last walked?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account