Graham's Magazine, Vol. XIX, No. 5, November 1841Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XIX, No. 5, November 1841
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
[Illustration: signature of H. F. Gould.]
About Miss Gould’s MS. there is great neatness, picturesqueness, and
finish, without over-effeminacy. The literary style of one who writes
thus will always be remarkable for sententiousness and epigrammatism;
and these are the leading features of Miss Gould’s poetry.
[Illustration: signature of C. S. Henry]
Prof. Henry, of Bristol College, is chiefly known by his contributions
to our Quarterlies, and as one of the originators of the New-York
Review, in conjunction with Dr. Hawks and Professor Anthon. His
chirography is now neat and picturesque, (much resembling that of Judge
Tucker,) and now excessively scratchy, _clerky_, and slovenly—so that
it is nearly impossible to say anything respecting it, except that it
indicates a vacillating disposition, with unsettled ideas of the
beautiful. None of his epistles, in regard to their chirography, end as
well as they begin. This trait denotes _fatigability_. His signature,
which is bold and decided, conveys not the faintest idea of the general
MS.
[Illustration: signature of Emma C. Embury]
Mrs. Embury is chiefly known by her contributions to the Periodicals of
the country. She is one of the most nervous of our female writers, and
is not destitute of originality—that rarest of all qualities in a
woman, and especially in an American woman.
Her MS. evinces a strong disposition to fly off at a tangent from the
old formulæ of the Boarding Academies. Both in it, and in her literary
style, it would be well that she should no longer hesitate to discard
the absurdities of mere fashion.
[Illustration: signature of Wm. Landor.]
Mr. Landor acquired much reputation as the author of “Stanley,” a work
which was warmly commended by the press throughout the country. He has
also written many excellent papers for the Magazines. His chirography is
usually _petite_, without hair-lines, close, and somewhat stiff. Many
words are carefully erased. His epistles have always a rigorous
formality about them. The whole is strongly indicative of his literary
qualities. He is an elaborately careful, stiff, and pedantic writer,
with much affectation and great talent. Should he devote himself
ultimately to letters, he cannot fail of high success.
[Illustration: signature of Eliza Leslie]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account