Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 4, April 1852Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 4, April 1852
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Arguing on this statement, in my “Field Sports,” knowing Meadows to have
seen both animals, that they must be distinct, I pointed out—no one
could dream of comparing a Lapland Reindeer’s track to that of an _ox_,
any more than to that of an elephant; and observed further, that the
Lapland Reindeer is not a larger, but—to my recollection—a smaller
animal than the common American Red-deer, _Cervus_ _Virginianus_ of
Naturalists. This coming casually under Mr. Wallop’s eye, he wrote to
me, in full confirmation of my opinion, that he had recently seen
Lapland Reindeer in the Regent’s Park Zoological Gardens, and wished to
amend his former _dictum_, by saying, that the Cariboo is at least
one-third taller than the Lapland deer, and otherwise larger, and in
other respects very different. Also, that the Lapland animal is not
taller than the British Stag, or the American Common Deer, or, if at
all, very slightly so.
Now, to come to my own observation, verified by measurement. The Cariboo
antlers in my own possession, not an unusually large pair, measure as
follows:
Extreme width from tip to tip, one foot 4½ inches. Length of curvature
of antlers, from root to tip, two feet 3½ inches. Direct height, 23
inches. Breadth of the palmated brow antlers, 8 inches. Length of do.,
11 inches. Breadth of upper palm, 8 inches. Length of do., 12 inches.
Girth at the root of antler, 5½ inches. At insertion of upper prong, 4
inches. Number of prongs at the tips, unequal—three and two. At the
upper palms, three. On the lower palms, seven processes, including the
principal point.
Compare with this, the measurements of the antlers of a very fine
specimen of the common American deer, _Cervus Virginianus_.
Extreme width from tip to tip, 11 inches. Length of curvature along the
back of antlers from root to tip, two feet and half an inch. Direct
height, 15 inches.
Observe, however, that the greater curvature in the horns of the
American deer, while it causes a larger comparative measurement, leaves
a vast excess in height and show to the Cariboo.
In the Cariboo, moreover—see cut—the structure of the horns is
directly the reverse of that of any other palmated-horned animal I ever
remember to have seen; as the Moose, the English Fallow-deer, and to the
best of my recollection the Europe-Asiatic Reindeer. In both the former
of these animals, the broad palms form the extreme upper tips; while the
lower spurs and brow antlers are round prongs; and, to the best of my
memory, the reindeer has no very conspicuous palms at all.
In our common deer, again, contrary to any other deer I have ever
seen—except a very noble non-descript specimen recently sent from
Calcutta to the Spirit of the Times—the main branch of the antlers
curves _forward_ over the brow, offering the main defenses, the true
brow antlers being mere erect prongs; while all the tines are posterior
to the main branch.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account