Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 6, June 1852Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 6, June 1852
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
It must be admitted that Cousin’s system did not long hold its ground.
After the first surprise was over, the metaphysicians _par eminence_
began to attack him with great fury, and gave him some blows from which
he has never recovered; and the public, who had been carried away by his
eloquence, forgot him as soon as another novelty appeared. The result
has been, that of late he has not been estimated according to his real
merits. He most certainly has not done what he pretended to do. He has
not reconciled the philosophers or the philosophies; he has hardly
formed a school; his disciples have expired, recanted, or left the
inclusive for some more satisfactory exclusive system. But he is still a
metaphysician of uncommon power, acuteness, insight, genius; his works
are full of important truths and principles, which stimulate the mind to
independent thought; his information is immense; and he is the most
brilliant, comprehensible and readable of all the historians of
philosophy. He is to metaphysical history what Macaulay is to civil
history; and we do not see why the present work is not as capable of
holding the pleased and breathless attention of the intelligent reader
as the “History of the Revolution of 1688.” There is in both writers the
same confident manner of settling controversies about which centuries of
disputants have wrangled; and, on the first blush, it seems impossible
to resist the statements of either of them, as both drive directly at
the common sense of men; are clear and brilliant, while their opponents
are obscure and dull; and never leave the impression of an undefined
something outside of the limits of their respective systems, to puzzle
and torture their readers with a latent doubt. “I wish,” said Lord
Melbourne, “that I knew any thing as well as Tom Macaulay knows every
thing.” This “I know,” and “I am sure,” this absence of self-distrust,
is as characteristic of Cousin as Macaulay; and the mischief is that
after reading either, we are apt to be as satisfied as they are
themselves, and think we have thoroughly mastered the matter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account