Graham's Magazine, Vol. XLI, No. 1, July 1852Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XLI, No. 1, July 1852
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
This bird was not sacred among the ancient Egyptians, but there is
reason to believe that it was so with the Assyrians. It has not only
been found as an ornament on the robes of figures in the most ancient
edifices at Nimroud, but it was frequently introduced on Babylonian and
Assyrian cylinders, always accompanied by the emblematical flower. The
Romans appear to have regarded it as a delicacy, for Apicius left a
receipt for a particular sauce for dressing it; and it is recorded of
Heliogabalus, that he had the brains of six hundred of these birds
served up as a dish at one of his feasts. But in trencher feats the
pseudo-emperor Formius far outdid either, as it is related by Vopiscus,
that be devoured a whole ostrich to his own share at a single sitting.
It was broadly asserted by Aristotle, that the ostrich was partly bird
and partly quadruped; and by Pliny, that it might almost be said to
belong to the class of beasts; ridiculous as such assertions might be
supposed, they were not altogether without foundation according to the
knowledge of the times. The common name by which the ostrich was
designated by the Greeks and Romans, and also by the nations of the
East, was the _camel bird_. Indeed, the total want of feathers on its
long and very powerful legs, and the division of the feet into two toes
only, connected at their base by a membrane, are very similar to the
legs and long, divided hoof of the camel: nor does the resemblance cease
here, for there is another singularity in their external conformation,
which affords a still more remarkable coincidence. Both camel and
ostrich are furnished with hard, callous protuberances on the chest, and
on the posterior part of the abdomen, on which they support themselves
when at rest, and they both lie down in the same manner, by first
bending their knees, then applying the anterior callosity, and lastly
the posterior, to the ground. When to this we add the patience of thirst
of both, and their inhabiting the same arid deserts, the two may well be
compared with each other.
The ostrich is altogether destitute of the power of flight, and
accordingly the wings are reduced to a very low state of development,
merely sufficient, in fact, to aid it when running at speed. The sharp
keel of the breast-bone, which, in birds of rapid flight, affords an
extensive surface for the attachment of the muscles moving the wings, is
not required, and the surface of the bone is therefore flat, like that
of a quadruped, but the muscles of the legs are of extraordinary
magnitude.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account