Graham's Magazine, Vol. XLI, No. 2, August 1852 — John Shaqi
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XLI, No. 2, August 1852Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XLI, No. 2, August 1852
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
But however much we may take from the moral greatness usually attributed
to Newton—and a considerable abatement is unquestionably necessary—his
reputation for wonderful sagacity and grasp of mind is incapable of
impeachment. The course of events has only served to render more
conspicuous that sublime intelligence by which he unraveled the
mechanism of the heavens, and establish more indisputably his claim to
be regarded as the architect of physical astronomy. To determine the
motions of the heavenly bodies was the work of Keppler: to explain and
demonstrate the causes of those motions was the achievement of Newton.
So far, however, from gaining universal assent when first proposed, his
theory was ill understood, slightly appreciated, or altogether rejected
by numbers of scientific men; and—especially on the continent—it very
slowly won its way to notice and confidence. Newton survived the
publication of the Principia forty years, and at the time of his
death—according to Voltaire—it had not twenty readers out of the
country of its production. It was not until the mutual perturbations of
the planets began to occupy the attention of the continental
philosophers, that his theory was fully admitted abroad, and the work in
which it was developed took the rank it has since occupied,
preëminent—in the words of Laplace—above all the productions of the
human mind. It is a common, but vulgar error, to suppose the merit of
our countryman to lie in conceiving the idea of the attraction of
gravitation. That idea had been suggested to many minds long before his
time, and the impression had been created that such a power in nature
was the cause of the planetary motions. Thus Keppler surmised an
attractive force to reside in the sun, producing these movements; and he
even threw out the conjecture that this force diminishes in proportion
to the square of the distance of the body on which it was exerted.
Borelli and Hooke, also, distinctly developed the influence of gravity;
and both referred the orbits of the planets to the doctrine of
attraction combining with their own proper motions to produce
curvilinear movements. What really distinguished Newton, was not the
idea of gravity as the principle of attachment between the different
members of the solar system, but proving it to be so. He succeeded vague
surmise upon the point with mathematical demonstration: explained and
applied the laws of the force—an accomplishment which crowns him with
honor above all his rivals; inasmuch as he who works a mine, and
distributes its wealth through society, is incomparably in advance of
him who has merely apprehended its existence, but failed in gaining
access to its treasures.
[Illustration]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account