Graham's Magazine, Vol. XVIII, No. 5, May 1841Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XVIII, No. 5, May 1841
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
What we here give in Italics is the duplicate title, on two separate
title-pages, of an octavo volume of three hundred and sixty two pages.
Why this method of nomenclature should have been adopted is more than we
can understand—although it arises, _perhaps_, from a certain confusion
and hesitation observable in the whole structure of the book itself.
Publishers have an idea, however, (and no doubt they are the best judges
in such matters) that a complete work obtains a readier sale than one
“to be continued” and we see plainly that it is with the design of
intimating the _entireness_ of the volume now before us, that “_The Old
Curiosity Shop and other Tales_,” has been made not only the primary and
main title, but the name of the whole publication as indicated by the
back. This may be quite fair in trade, but is morally wrong not the
less. The volume is only one of a series—only part of a whole; and the
title has no right to _insinuate otherwise_. So obvious is this
intention to misguide, that it has led to the absurdity of putting the
inclusive, or general, title of the series, as a secondary instead of a
primary one. Anybody may see that if the wish had been fairly to
represent the plan and extent of the volume, something like this would
have been given on a single page—
“_Master Humphrey’s Clock. By Charles Dickens. Part I. Containing The
Old Curiosity Shop, and other Tales, with Numerous Illustrations, &c.
&c._”
This would have been better for all parties, a good deal more honest,
and a vast deal more easily understood. In fact, there is sufficient
uncertainty of purpose in the book itself, without resort to
mystification in the matter of title. We do not think it altogether
impossible that the rumors in respect to the sanity of Mr. Dickens which
were so prevalent during the publication of the first numbers of the
work, had some slight—some very slight foundation in truth. By this, we
mean merely to say that the mind of the author, at the time, might
possibly have been struggling with some of those manifold and multiform
_aberrations_ by which the nobler order of genius is so frequently
beset—but which are still so very far removed from disease.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account