Graham's Magazine, Vol. XVIII, No. 6, June 1841Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XVIII, No. 6, June 1841
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
But the greatest difficulty with the “occasional” as well as shorter
pieces of a volume of poems, is the difference between the circumstances
under which they were severally penned, and those under which they are
perused. One reads, in the self-same hour, the diversified productions
of years. How, then, can a writer anticipate the appreciation of his
sentiments? He has ceased to enter into his _own_ peculiar,
circumstance-generated emotions. How, therefore, may others take his
views? To suppose an ability on the part of the critic, to do justice,
then, to the earlier and less-studied _morceaux_, (or, as I have styled
them above, the egotistical pieces of an author,) would be to suppose an
utter impossibility—a sort of critical _ubiquity_. Coleridge felt the
truth of what I have advanced,—as any one may learn from the preface of
his “Juvenile Poems.” He therein expresses his apprehensions in the
following language:—“I shall only add, that each of my readers will, I
hope, remember that these poems, on various subjects, which he reads at
one time, and under the influence of one set of feelings, were written
at different times, and prompted by very different feelings; and,
therefore, the inferiority of one poem to another, may, sometimes, be
owing to the temper of mind in which he happens to peruse it.”
What shall we say, then? Shall an author abstain from publishing his
shorter and occasional pieces, on account of the facts alluded to by
Coleridge? By no means, I would say, though a consideration thereof may
well deter the judicious writer from admitting into his volume every
thing he may have penned. As to the dimensions of pieces, it may be more
advisable, in some cases, to republish the shortest sonnets, and the
like, relating to one’s own personal feelings and relations, than longer
productions—at least they are likely to be more pleasing to the general
reader. They are unquestionably useful, as throwing light upon points of
a man’s private history with a force of illumination which no biographer
could use, were he to attempt it—a something, by-the-bye, which seldom
happens; indicating the probability, that we seldom read _the_ man’s
real biography, but merely _a_ man’s—often an ideal man only.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account