Graham's Magazine, Vol. XX, No. 5, May 1842Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XX, No. 5, May 1842
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Hawthorne are the product of a truly imaginative
intellect, restrained, and in some measure repressed, by fastidiousness
of taste, by constitutional melancholy and by indolence.
But it is of his tales that we desire principally to speak. The tale
proper, in our opinion, affords unquestionably the fairest field for the
exercise of the loftiest talent, which can be afforded by the wide
domains of mere prose. Were we bidden to say how the highest genius
could be most advantageously employed for the best display of its own
powers, we should answer, without hesitation—in the composition of a
rhymed poem, not to exceed in length what might be perused in an hour.
Within this limit alone can the highest order of true poetry exist. We
need only here say, upon this topic, that, in almost all classes of
composition, the unity of effect or impression is a point of the
greatest importance. It is clear, moreover, that this unity cannot be
thoroughly preserved in productions whose perusal cannot be completed at
one sitting. We may continue the reading of a prose composition, from
the very nature of prose itself, much longer than we can persevere, to
any good purpose, in the perusal of a poem. This latter, if truly
fulfilling the demands of the poetic sentiment, induces an exaltation of
the soul which cannot be long sustained. All high excitements are
necessarily transient. Thus a long poem is a paradox. And, without unity
of impression, the deepest effects cannot be brought about. Epics were
the offspring of an imperfect sense of Art, and their reign is no more.
A poem _too_ brief may produce a vivid, but never an intense or enduring
impression. Without a certain continuity of effort—without a certain
duration or repetition of purpose—the soul is never deeply moved. There
must be the dropping of the water upon the rock. De Béranger has wrought
brilliant things—pungent and spirit-stirring—but, like all immassive
bodies, they lack _momentum_, and thus fail to satisfy the Poetic
Sentiment. They sparkle and excite, but, from want of continuity, fail
deeply to impress. Extreme brevity will degenerate into epigrammatism;
but the sin of extreme length is even more unpardonable. _In medio
tutissimus ibis._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account