Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXI, No. 6, December 1842Various
History
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXI, No. 6, December 1842
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Women cannot write history. It requires too great solidity, and too
minute research for their quick intellects. They write, instead,
delightful memoirs. Who, but an antiquary or historical commentator, had
not rather read Lucy Hutchinson’s Life of her Husband, than any of the
professed histories of the Commonwealth—and exchange Lady Fanshawe for
the other royalist biographers.
Neither are women to turn politicians or orators. We hope never to hear
of a female Burke; she would be an overbearing termagant. A spice of a
talent for scolding, is the highest form of eloquence we can
conscientiously allow the ladies.
Criticism is for men; when women assume it, they write scandal. The
current notion of criticism with most, is that of libelous abuse. From
all such, Heaven defend us.
Women feel more than they think, and (sometimes) say more than do. They
are consequently better adapted to describe sentiments, than to
speculate on causes and effects. They are more at home in their letters,
than in tracts of political economy.
The proper faculties in women to cultivate most assiduously are, the
taste and the religious sentiment; the first, as the leading trait of
the intellectual; and the last, as the governing power of the moral
constitution. Give a woman a pure taste and high principles, and she is
safe from the arts of the wiliest libertine. Let her have all other
gifts but these, and she is comparatively defenceless. Taste purifies
the heart as well as the head, and religion strengthens both. The
strongest propensities to pleasure are not so often the means of
disgrace and ruin, as the carelessness of ignorant virtue, and an
unenlightened moral sense. This makes all the difference in the world,
between the daughter of a poor countryman, and the child of an educated
gentleman. Both have the same desires, but how differently directed and
controlled. Yet we find nineteen lapses from virtue in the one case,
where we find one in the other.
Believing that what does not interest, does not benefit the mind, we
would avoid all pedantic lectures to women, on all subjects to which
they discover any aversion. Study should be made a pleasure, and reading
pure recreation. In a general sense, we would say the best works for
female readers are those that tend to form the highest domestic
character. Works of the highest imagination, as being above that
condition, and scientific authors, who address a different class of
faculties, are both unsuitable. An admirable wife may not relish the
sublimity of Milton or Hamlet; and a charming companion be ignorant of
the existence of such a science as Algebra. A superficial acquaintance
with the elements of the physical sciences, is worse than total
unacquaintance with them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account