Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXX, No. 4, April 1847Various
History
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXX, No. 4, April 1847
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
To sum up our most serious objections, in a few words, we should say
that Carlyle indicates a depth,—and we mean not impliedly, but
distinctly,—which he neglects to fathom. We want to know more about
that which he wants to know as well. If any luminous star, or
undissolvable nebula, is visible from his station, which is not visible
from ours, the interests of science require that the fact be
communicated to us. The universe expects every man to do his duty in his
parallel of latitude. We want to hear more of his inmost life; his hymn
and prayer, more; his elegy and eulogy, less; that he should speak more
from his character, and less from his talent; communicate centrally with
his readers, and not by a side; that he should say what he believes,
without suspecting that men disbelieve it, out of his
never-misunderstood nature. Homer and Shakspeare speak directly and
confidently to us. The confidence implied in the unsuspicious tone of
the world’s worthies, is a great and encouraging fact. Dig up some of
the earth you stand on, and show that. If he gave us religiously the
meagre results of his experience, his style would be less picturesque
and diversified, but more attractive and impressive. His genius can
cover all the land with gorgeous palaces, but the reader does not abide
in them, but pitches his tent rather in the desert and on the mountain
peak.
When we look about for something to quote, as the fairest specimen of
the man, we confess that we labor under an unusual difficulty; for his
philosophy is so little of the proverbial or sentential kind, and opens
so gradually, rising insensibly from the reviewer’s level, and
developing its thought completely and in detail, that we look in vain
for the brilliant passages, for point and antithesis, and must end by
quoting his works entire. What in a writer of less breadth would have
been the proposition which would have bounded his discourse, his column
of victory, his Pillar of Hercules, and _ne plus ultra_, is in Carlyle
frequently the same thought unfolded; no Pillar of Hercules, but a
considerable prospect, north and south, along the Atlantic coast. There
are other pillars of Hercules, like beacons and light-houses, still
further in the horizon, toward Atlantis, set up by a few ancient and
modern travelers; but, so far as this traveler goes, he clears and
colonizes, and all the surplus population of London is bound thither at
once. What we would quote is, in fact, his vivacity, and not any
particular wisdom or sense, which last is ever synonymous with sentence,
[_sententia_,] as in his cotemporaries, Coleridge, Landor and
Wordsworth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account