Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXXVI, No. 3, March 1850 — John Shaqi
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXXVI, No. 3, March 1850Various
History
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXXVI, No. 3, March 1850
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
“I acknowledge not the authority of this court. Were I to do so, it were
to betray the sacred and inviolable trust confided to me in the care of
the liberties of the British people. Your delegation, to be legal,
should have come alike from the individual voice of the meanest and most
ignorant boor of this realm, as from the high and cultivated hypocrites
who have empowered you. Should I ratify such an authority—in the eyes
of the law not better founded than that of pirates and murderers—I
would indeed be the traitor ye would brand me. Nay, let me rather die a
martyr to the constitution. But before ye proceed to pronounce the
judgment ye threaten, I demand, by all those rights of inheritance which
invest me as a monarch, with a majesty and power second only to the
Omnipotent, to be heard before a convention of both houses of
Parliament; and, whether or not ye refuse me, I adjure ye, the so-called
judges of this court, as ye each hope to be arraigned at no unlawful or
incompetent bar at the final judgment, to pause and reflect before ye
take upon ye the high-handed responsibility of passing sentence upon
your king.”
He resumed his seat, and after a few moments’ intense quiet, William
Heath arose, and suggested that the court would do well to adjourn for a
brief season for the purpose of taking into consideration the request of
the prisoner.
The expediency of this suggestion was acceded to, and they withdrew and
remained for some fifteen or twenty minutes in conference.
On their return, after a few moments’ consultation with some of the
older judges, Lisle among the rest, Bradshaw, taking a parchment from
the table, turned to the king with these words:
“Charles Stuart, you have in your request to be heard before Parliament,
as well as in other language addressed by you some moments since to this
honorable court, given a fresh denial of its jurisdiction, and an added
proof of your contempt. It has already, by such contumacy on your part,
been too long delayed, and must now proceed to pass judgment against
you. You have been proven a traitor to England in waging war against her
Parliament, and in refusing to plead in your own behalf, or endeavoring
to invalidate such proof, justice has no alternative but to demand your
death. The following warrant has therefore been agreed upon by your
judges, who will presently affix their signatures thereunto. ‘_We, the
Commissioners appointed by the Commons to sit in trial on Charles
Stuart, King of England, arraigned as a traitor, tyrant and murderer,
having found these charges amply substantiated, do for the glory of God,
and the liberties of the British people, hereby adjudge him to death._’”
He ceased: the members of the court had risen during the reading of the
warrant, to testify their concurrence, and the fatal document was now
circulated among them to receive their various signatures. It was
observed to be written in the chirography of Cromwell.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account