"Granny's Chapters" (on scriptural subjects): The New Testament, with a Sketch of the Subsequent History of the Jews.Ross, Mary, Lady
Religion
"Granny's Chapters" (on scriptural subjects): The New Testament, with a Sketch of the Subsequent History of the Jews.
Ross, Mary, Lady
Bible stories, English -- New Testament; Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History
Even binding a Roman citizen was unlawful, and for doing this Claudius
Lysias was liable to be punished. Nero, who had become Emperor of Rome
about four years before this time, on the death of Claudius, A.D. 54,
was a harsh and cruel tyrant; and though he would not have cared
whether St. Paul was tortured or not, he would have been very angry if
any of the laws concerning the Roman privileges had been broken; and
therefore Claudius Lysias had good reason to fear, that if St. Paul
complained of the treatment which he, a free-born citizen of Rome, had
received, the Emperor would cause him to be punished. If he had known
more of the precepts taught by Jesus, he would have felt sure that St.
Paul would have no wish to revenge himself in such a manner. The
Apostle made use of his rights as a Roman citizen to save himself from
a cruel punishment; because, if he had been scourged, it might have
led men to think that he must have been guilty of some crime to
deserve such a punishment; and it was necessary that the teachers of
the holy Word of God should appear blameless before all men.
The chief captain now took other measures for finding out what St.
Paul was accused of; and he summoned the Sanhedrim to meet, that they
might in a lawful manner examine and judge the prisoner, and so
ascertain whether there was any reason for the rage of the people
against him. We read, "On the morrow, because he would have known the
certainty wherefore he was accused of the Jews, he loosed him from his
bands, and commanded the chief priests and all their council to
appear, and brought Paul down, and set him before them. And Paul,
earnestly beholding the council, said, Men and brethren, I have lived
in all good conscience before God until this day."
Now that the Apostle was called upon to defend himself, he rightly
wished all men to understand, that he was no criminal deserving of
anger or punishment; but a man who had always tried to do what he
believed to be his duty in the sight of God: most truly could he say
that he had done this; for even when he persecuted the followers of
Jesus, it was under the mistaken idea that it was his duty to do so.
But the Jews were angry at his saying this, "and the high priest
Ananias commanded them that stood by him to smite him on the mouth.
Then said Paul unto him, God shall smite thee, thou whited wall: for
sittest thou to judge me after the law, and commandest me to be
smitten contrary to the law? And they that stood by said, Revilest
thou God's high priest? Then said Paul, I wist not, brethren, that he
was the high priest: for it is written, Thou shalt not speak evil of
the ruler of thy people."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account