"Granny's Chapters" (on scriptural subjects): The New Testament, with a Sketch of the Subsequent History of the Jews.Ross, Mary, Lady
Religion
"Granny's Chapters" (on scriptural subjects): The New Testament, with a Sketch of the Subsequent History of the Jews.
Ross, Mary, Lady
Bible stories, English -- New Testament; Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History
The Apostle meant, that if he had known, or looked upon Ananias as
the High Priest, he would not have rebuked him in such words; because
a ruler of the people must be treated with respect, on account of his
office: but Ananias deserved the rebuke, for the Law commanded all who
ruled, or judged others, to do no unrighteousness or injustice
themselves; and Ananias broke the Law, and was guilty of very great
injustice in ordering St. Paul to be smitten in this way, before he
had been proved to be guilty of any crime. We must mention here that,
in fact, Ananias was _not_ the High Priest at this time. He had been
High Priest at the time of the famine, when Barnabas and Saul took
help to the poor brethren at Jerusalem; but after that, there had been
some disturbance between the Jews and Samaritans, and the Romans,
thinking Ananias to blame, deprived him of his sacred office, and sent
him as a prisoner to Rome: and though he was afterwards allowed to
return to Jerusalem, he was not restored to the office of High Priest,
to which another man, named Jonathan, had been appointed. This
Jonathan had been killed by the "murderers" hired by Felix the Roman
governor, and no other High Priest had as yet been appointed;
therefore there was, in fact, _no_ High Priest to be president, or
head, of the Sanhedrim. Under these circumstances, Ananias set himself
up as chief of the Council, and behaved in the unjust manner related.
St. Paul had only been a very few days in Jerusalem, and did not
perhaps know that Ananias had taken the office of High Priest upon
himself; or if he did know it, what he said would be a just rebuke to
him for having done so.
One other matter requires a few words, that is, the "whited wall," to
which St. Paul compared Ananias. We shall remember that our Saviour
said, "Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like
unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outwardly, but
are within full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. Even so ye
also appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy
and iniquity." In the same manner St. Paul applied the comparison of
the "whited wall" of a sepulchre to Ananias, who pretended to judge
and rebuke another, whilst his own heart was full of all evil passions
and iniquity.
Let us remember, that each such passage of Scripture has a lesson for
us: all who only think of what men will say, and try to _appear_ good
in the eyes of their fellow creatures, without trying to love and
serve God with all their heart, and to do His will whatever men may
think of them, are no more pleasing in the eyes of our Lord, than were
the Pharisees, whom Jesus compared to "whited sepulchres."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account